- May 18, 2007
- 1
- 0
- 6
Is this really what the modern world advises, when a chicken gets sick chop its head off?
I did join this forum to ask about legislation regarding this practice, im in the uk.
Our cottage neighbours townies moving in from liverpool council estate to keeping chickens of which they will not fork out money for a vet despite being a vet being available.
This guy has lived on a council estate, his chicken developed scaly leg, it became infected and the wound was putrid, an easy disease to treat with ivermectin, and keeping the wound clean wouldnt you agree?
Anyway rather than taking the poor chook to the vet after it suffering for a fortnight, he decided to take an axe to its head to save the vet bill.
I think this practice is barbaric and any animal mammal or bird that has rewarded you with their timidity trust and of course eggs every day deserves a wee bitmore respect and caring than taking an axe to its head.
I dont believe this guy couldve possibly done the job right first off, as one hes never had a chicken, two he didnt have anythign in which to secure the bird so it wouldnt move, surely a chicken wouldnt just sit there waiting for an axe to chop its head off.
if anyone can justify this as being the way forward for chicken keepers, then i really would like to know.
Without a veterinary prognosis how on earth can you decide if the bird you are about to chop its head of really has reached the end of its life?
is it selfishly motivated, no eggs, head for the chop, illness, how are we to know when an illness is termiinal and the bird is suffering and whether we cant treat it?
i wold like to hear from others, cos i personally wish to know the mentality i am up against with my new neighbours.
if hes capable of this kindof brutality what elseis he capable of?
many thanks in advance for any replies
donna
scotrat animal rescue
I did join this forum to ask about legislation regarding this practice, im in the uk.
Our cottage neighbours townies moving in from liverpool council estate to keeping chickens of which they will not fork out money for a vet despite being a vet being available.
This guy has lived on a council estate, his chicken developed scaly leg, it became infected and the wound was putrid, an easy disease to treat with ivermectin, and keeping the wound clean wouldnt you agree?
Anyway rather than taking the poor chook to the vet after it suffering for a fortnight, he decided to take an axe to its head to save the vet bill.
I think this practice is barbaric and any animal mammal or bird that has rewarded you with their timidity trust and of course eggs every day deserves a wee bitmore respect and caring than taking an axe to its head.
I dont believe this guy couldve possibly done the job right first off, as one hes never had a chicken, two he didnt have anythign in which to secure the bird so it wouldnt move, surely a chicken wouldnt just sit there waiting for an axe to chop its head off.
if anyone can justify this as being the way forward for chicken keepers, then i really would like to know.
Without a veterinary prognosis how on earth can you decide if the bird you are about to chop its head of really has reached the end of its life?
is it selfishly motivated, no eggs, head for the chop, illness, how are we to know when an illness is termiinal and the bird is suffering and whether we cant treat it?
i wold like to hear from others, cos i personally wish to know the mentality i am up against with my new neighbours.
if hes capable of this kindof brutality what elseis he capable of?
many thanks in advance for any replies
donna
scotrat animal rescue