Well, I just got back from seeing the film. I don't know if it's possible to spoiler a documentary, but if you don't want to hear about what it was like then skip the rest of this post.
I won't be able to give the same perspective on the movie that some people will, because much of the information given in it I knew already-- I've read Fast Food Nation, and its author Eric Schlosser was one of the makers of this film and also features prominently in it. The central point of the movie was basically that when you add up the following:
1) ignorant or apathetic Americans who insist on paying the lowest possible prices for food,
2) huge centralized corporations trying to cut costs in every way possible, and
3) government subsidies,
....you end up with big problems. It becomes a selfish circle of everybody trying to do what they
think is in their own best interest, even at the expense of someone else's.
Four companies control 80% of the beef and pork market, which means that they can basically treat the farmers who work for them however they want. A chicken farmer who works for Tyson was interviewed in Kentucky. He operated a number of chicken houses with a total of 300,000 birds in them, and wanted to show the interviewers around inside but "multiple visits from Tyson caused him to change his mind." Many thousands of clucks could be heard from inside the completely closed up buildings. He noted that the chickens there never see the light of day.
Tyson, Smithfield, and Monsanto all declined to be interviewed for the film. I assume BPI also did, but I don't recall whether that was mentioned or not.
The most interesting part of the film to me was the discussion of corn, and how many things have been derived from it-- and also how much money the government pours into subsidies for it which make it so cheap. Corn gets fed to cattle because it's a) cheap and b) makes them fatten up quickly. Unfortunately, their stomachs are not designed to handle it nearly as well as grass. Additionally, cows raised in grassy fields can provide the fertilizer for their own food, as was pointed out by Joel Salatin of
Polyface Farms . Salatin is a (sometimes alarmingly) emphatic supporter of sustainable farming, and was interviewed at length.
The discussion of Monsanto lost me a bit because I'm not up on the technicalities of what it means to patent a gene, or what it means to re-use soybean seeds.
There was an interview with a woman whose young son died from e-coli coming from a burger from Jack in the Box. I remember reading about that in Fast Food Nation, and how long it took-- 16 days after the boy's death-- to recall the meat.
We received a dizzying list of former high-ranking executives from major food companies who then received posts in the federal government that would give them significant influence over regulation standards in both the Clinton and Bush administrations.
Slaughterhouses in general came under fire for ruthless treatment of workers due to the desire to turn out as much meat as possible in as little time as possible. The jobs don't take much skill, and a lot of people are needed for them so slaughterhouses will "import" Mexican workers without worrying about checking their legal status, who then of course are not treated as having any right to a safe workplace because they're illegal. The largest slaughterhouse in the world, Smithfield in Tar Heel North Carolina, was accused of occasionally turning over small numbers of workers to the police to satisfy the public desire to keep illegal immigrants out.
The take-home message was simple and explicit-- it actually was printed on the screen at the end of the film. Know what's in your food, and where it comes from. Encourage your government to stop handing out enormous subsidies, even if it means food will cost a bit more. And make the government entities responsible for ensuring the safety of food and food workers do their job.
It's possible to state facts which are not necessarily bad but are made sound bad nonetheless, and the film was guilty of that from time to time, especially at the beginning. Making the food production process simpler, cheaper, and more efficient is not a
inherently bad thing. It wasn't a bad thing that fast food made the assembly process automatic, so that unskilled workers (read: teenagers) could do it for a low wage. Corn is definitely not a bad thing (mmm.....corn). But seeking the cheapest solutions without thinking things through can have unintended consequences that turn out to be very bad. It seems like the dramatic increase in distance that has arisen between consumers and the origins of their food, both geographically and mentally, has caused some such consequences.