- Jan 8, 2017
- 9,131
- 19,878
- 842
Oh. Bison that is right. Some reason moose stuck in my head.Are you talking about the baby bison that was taken and put in an SUV at Yellowstone or was this a different incident?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh. Bison that is right. Some reason moose stuck in my head.Are you talking about the baby bison that was taken and put in an SUV at Yellowstone or was this a different incident?
I am not saying not to take care of the duckling, maybe a rehab would be the best place as they know what to do with stranded wild ducklings and other such birds that fall under the migratory bird act. They would also know the proper feeds and would rehabilitate it back to be able to live in the wild.
I am posting to clear up some other statements - if a native wild bird it is illegal to posses without a permit as stated here:
https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/laws-legislations/migratory-bird-treaty-act.php
And, if you don't want to click on the link:
The Migratory Bird Treaty Act makes it illegal for anyone to take, possess, import, export, transport, sell, purchase, barter, or offer for sale, purchase, or barter, any migratory bird, or the parts, nests, or eggs of such a bird except under the terms of a valid permit issued pursuant to Federal regulations. The migratory bird species protected by the Act are listed in 50 CFR 10.13.
1) the act you are quoting ONLY applies to Federal Law and not state law AND does not list the EXEMPTIONS such as some have already mentioned on here i.e. zoos
2) the act you are quoting ONLY applies to CERTAIN situations and to CERTAIN avian species
For example, they (meaning cities and homeowners associations) REGULARLY and LEGALLY round up and KILL Muscovy ducks in Florida as it is not A NATIVE species. Neither is the Florida Flamingo. So there are A LOT of situations that this ACT does NOT apply.
Also, the legislative intent behind the ACT is for harming or transporting in interstate commerce, not for someone wanting to love and take care of an abandon animal.
Just like I read on here is it illegal to use certain antibiotics. If you actually read the law it is for people that are raising the poultry for commercial purposes. It does not apply when it is someone's pet.
Actually, I am NOT getting off this site as there will always be bullies. If I BOIL your blood then you go spend hundred of thousands of dollars on law school. She can NOW say she depended on an ATTORNEYS advice in keeping her DUCK!
1) the act you are quoting ONLY applies to Federal Law and not state law AND does not list the EXEMPTIONS such as some have already mentioned on here i.e. zoos
2) the act you are quoting ONLY applies to CERTAIN situations and to CERTAIN avian species
For example, they (meaning cities and homeowners associations) REGULARLY and LEGALLY round up and KILL Muscovy ducks in Florida as it is not A NATIVE species. Neither is the Florida Flamingo. So there are A LOT of situations that this ACT does NOT apply.
Also, the legislative intent behind the ACT is for harming or transporting in interstate commerce, not for someone wanting to love and take care of an abandon animal.
Just like I read on here is it illegal to use certain antibiotics. If you actually read the law it is for people that are raising the poultry for commercial purposes. It does not apply when it is someone's pet.
Actually, I am NOT getting off this site as there will always be bullies. If I BOIL your blood then you go spend hundred of thousands of dollars on law school. She can NOW say she depended on an ATTORNEYS advice in keeping her DUCK!
Nah, they are referring to me.Are you keeping the duckling? Are you directing your comment at me or a previous user? I am just trying to help.

Nah, they are referring to me.![]()
Just responded.Oh. Did you get my message re. the muscovy ducks?
