Free range breed advice

He doesn’t have any issues that I’ve noticed. He was my only rooster but when I got a Leghorn he became the subordinate. He is smaller because he is mixed with bantam or jungle fowl or something. They share the flock during the day and sleep in separate coops with separate flocks at night so they have worked out a strategy and he mates with the hens when the dominant rooster is occupied. I’ve noticed his little mohawk stands up when he gets flustered so maybe that helps him communicate.

I’ve posted this photo before but here he is settling a dispute before I got the other roo. It was over the second he got next to the hens. He’s very good at what he does.
View attachment 4296598

The promising stuff continues! Awesome little guy.

I’ll have to get used to the no neck feathers thing, but them having less feathers on their body would make them excellent for the summer temps here
 
No idea how true this is but I have read that while pullets don't tend to go broody, it's more likely once they're a few years old.

Personally I'm always quite sceptical of claims about breeds "not going broody". Sex-linked layers like Hylines have supposedly been intentionally bred to almost never go broody, and yet they still often do in my experience :confused:

Yeah, I’ve read that as well, and I’m equally sceptical. Would be a very interesting behaviour if it were true. I wonder if this delayed brooding leads to more success when raising the chicks.

We had quite a few of RSLs here, and none ever went broody. Over half of them got to the 4 and 5 year mark before they passed. Most they ever did was some behavioural clucking, that never led to anything else.
So I do think that some breeds are less prone to brooding. It could very well be that your keeping conditions are far more inviting for a broody. It could be very line dependent.
"Flighty" as in she can take off vertically like a helicopter :lau One second she's by my feet, the next she's landing on my head to tug at my collar or climb down my jacket in search of food.

She hatched in an incubator, not under a broody, and spent the first 24 hours with me because I won't put single chicks in a brooder. That might be why she's so tame, or she might just be the exception to the rule.
View attachment 4296612
View attachment 4296614
View attachment 4296619
View attachment 4296620
View attachment 4296616

Oh she’s gorgeous! Yup, I’m pretty much sold :lol: ! Maybe not this year’s addition, due to the brooding thing, but they are exactly what I’m looking for otherwise.
About time we got back some of the flight skills that were lost with the addition of the Brahma and Aseel genes!
 
Mine has gone broody once the majority of her adult years. She's made a very good job of it too.

She's survived till now, and is the oldest hen in the flock (now in her 9th year).

She's a UK standard. She benefits from her head feathers being trimmed where they obscure her vision once a year, after her moult (when the new feathers have grown in)

I've read that rumplessness is a disadvantage in breeding; fertility rates are statistically significantly lower for rumpless varieties. So if you want a broody, probably best avoided.

That’s encouraging to hear. As previously stated, I much prefer the look of the UK Araucana.
Do you think they would do OK over here? I worry a lot about the summer temps. I give no extra help to the birds during the summer, and I would prefer that to stay the same.

Yeah, I’ve read that too. Supposedly the European varieties are quite inbred.
There’s also the lethal gene, which kills a good percentage of the embryos
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom