I do realize that. I'm just not one of them.
Then you will be among the millions that will pass on EV's.
Care for CNG ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do realize that. I'm just not one of them.
My lawn mower cost more than that thing an uses more fuel an tops out a 5MPHAt that rate you can just take your lawn tractor, and not buy a new car.
What would happen if the Chinese (and other similar nationalities) would rise up, demanding to better work conditions, and better pay? I forsee that coming once those people realized that they would stand up and demand to be treated better and be paid better than the overcrowding motel/dorms near factories, living poor for years.........and yet, government turned a blind eye to what it is happening to their people and the environment of polluted waters and soil......... Come to think of it, our American companies are responsible for their demise and by that time, China and Japanese would run them out eventually unless they are too wrapped up in the $$$$$$$$$ signs.Sadly, we have lost ownership of a good many industries. While a company may still have the same name and the product look the same, where it is made has changed. Foreign investors do not buy US companies to deal with truculent labor unions and a plethora of government regulations. No, they buy companies to make money, acquire technology and patents and provide jobs for their own people. If you really want to know who owns a company, look at where it is made.
Brands we think of as being US companies may be owned by foreign entities. Think Schwinn, Chrysler, and Ames/True Temper, they are all foreign owned. They produce in countries with low labor cost and minimal government regulation.
It is better to buy something used in the second hand than to buy something new that is made in China.
Take a look at Mitsubishi Motors here in Normal, IL. It was booming until union laborers, higher wages, and poor automobile performance and safety records and testings really tested the auto plant. It used to be very popular, got the town increased ten fold in ten years, lasting roughly twenty years before it started to go downhill. Driving by the highway on I74, there were so many cars, trucks and vans sitting on huge lots, waiting to be sold/deliver to other dealers elsewhere......... not too many people buying new cars. If their cars got into a minor fender bender or door being dented a bit, many of them would just take the insurance money and put it in their household bills or whatever they need or would like to have.I would be careful about tariffs. they can back fire. Much of the Japanese Auto market moved jobs on shore to avoid tariffs against foreign autos but it also resulted in significant foreign investment. It didn't really save American autoworker jobs as much as it gave Japan greater control over domestic policy because of their investment. American auto workers still needed huge bail outs and are still struggling to compete. (For many reasons) Other tariffs tend to shut down our exports to foreign markets.
The easiest way to get Americans back to work is to get the boot of government off Americas neck and unleash the freedom to earn.
We had that issue here in IL, guess what happened? They couldn't come up with additional money to fix roads, so they put higher fees on license stickers a few years ago.But the current fuel taxes are not keeping up with the cost, so every year we add to the highway fund from the general fund. The general fund has no money left so they borrow more money to fix the roads.
So we agree that the roads need to be fixed.
Do you agree that the debt is to high ?
This reminds me of the oil embargo in the 70's when car companies were trying to get cars to get better gas mileage/electric cars but it failed miserably because it was so costly and therefore ineffective.No just that I've really started taking a critical eye to what people are saying.(and what they are not saying)
There were a lot of assumptions in the presentation.
The battery swap idea is great and exactly the kind of way you solve the range and charging problems.
I'm not saying we wont move to electric cars. I just think the future is much further off than they realize because they aren't going to get there before other economic realities set in.
If he thinks he is going to be able to have the billions of ready batteries and charged on the grand scale he hasn't really scaled the cost not only producing the batteries but the cost of the infrastructure that will charge the. Where is the electricity generation going to come from on the scale he is talking about.
I think we will get there I think its promising progress and he has thought a lot more about making it possible. I like the commitment of we are doing it but 2 cents a mile is nice to say I want to know how you arrive at those costs because when something sounds too good to be true it usually is.