This has been an interesting read, the joys of statistics! If you do enough reps of anything with 2 options (toss a coin perhaps) it should come out fifty fifty. The problem with hatching eggs is that we novices only do it on a small scale which a slight variation either direction can horribly skew the data. My son has a D in geography but as it is only the second week of school and he hasn’t turned in a group project that was due a day ago due to illness in the partner, I’m not worried (so few points this far, one small missing assignment makes a huge difference) but by the end of the quarter he’ll easily rectify it. Same with hatching chicks. While all sorts of little tricks may kill off a few undesired male eggs, overall it probably won’t account for more than a change of a couple percentage points in any direction. And if the broiler breeder (love that term) folks could figure out how to hatch sex selected eggs, they would hopefully have discovered it by now considering how much money and time it would save them! Same goes for the cancer curing capacity of your favorite herb, oil, or supplement, big pharma would soon isolate the compound and commercialize it if it was at all effective, save in an occasional case study. I’m running 4/5 male, 12/17 female, and 4/4 female on hatching quail this year, and no, the hatching parameters are all over the map (shipped eggs, home grown eggs, different incubators, one cold incubator temp, variable humidity, hand and autoturned …), just statistical probability. But maybe the post office crushed all the female eggs in my first shipment? How did they know? Interesting to contemplate but hard to prove without enough reps to produce statistical significance, hundreds or thousands of reps at one time, not many hobby breeders can pull that off!