Hi Latestarter,
Avian vets are not common here in Aust. either, and no cheaper than any other vet, however as I said, they are here for people who bother to look for them. Even if a person can't live near one of them, it is invaluable to be in contact with one of them, esp. to get info. and advice in emergencies. As for how people got by in the old days, they euthanized their animals that were suffering, much as many people do now.
I noticed that you believe paying for a vet visit for a $10 fowl isn't worth it, and I think that is a good part of where this whole sort of issue starts. It's a fact that people undervalue things that they don't pay a lot for. My point was that, many people here claim to "love" their chooks and want them to live through every illness and injury. That being the case, people EITHER have to go to the vet in the case of
serious illness or
serious injury, OR be willing to euthanize the animal if they can't go to a vet for whatever reason, inc. financial. Allowing an animal to suffer on and on just because the owner wants it to live is not appropriate, legal, or moral.
You may have missed what I said about three times in my other posts. The proviso was...if you can't afford a vet, you can't afford a pet, BUT if you do have a pet and it needs a vet which you can not take it to, you need to be willing to euthanize it quickly and painlessly yourself. Common sense and logical, I would have thought.
As for not having children if people can't afford to take care of them...I would have again thought that was common sense just as much as this is. It's not a question of being allowed to have them....anyone is allowed to have kids, but it would take a very irresponsible person to have kids if they already knew they wouldn't be able to take care of them for any reason, financial or otherwise. I would surely not like to be the child of someone who just wanted kids for their own sake, but knew they couldn't take care of me.

Anyway, I just thought I'd drop in and see how this thread was getting along. If everyone gave the right advice, we'd see less threads like this here, and rightly so...i.e. people coming here with problems that are well beyond the scope of this board to fix. The only appropriate advice in such situations is to get to a vet or euthanise the animal yourself if you're not willing/able to get to a vet - not encourage people to believe they can play vet to an animal that is suffering beyond belief. That is the reason I care about this....because advising people to treat their own animals who are suffering terribly is causing a lot of unnecessary suffering for these animals. It's not about the owners. It's about the animal.
If anyone would care to read the stickies at the start of this thread, (which I just did after finding my posts had been removed. lol), you will find that,
very responsibly, this site advises not to try to replace vet treatment with advice from this site when vet treatment appears to be needed.
In any case, I am very glad there is an actual vet around here now. I am also going to speak to my own avian vet and get him to keep an eye on this site now too, so hopefully he will give advice at times when needed.
Cheers all.