Help Rescind Chicken Ordinance

rosco

Songster
10 Years
Nov 24, 2009
495
6
121
Texas Panhandle
Here is a list of reasons I will take the city Commissioners asking them to rescind the ordinance the Animal Control Dept wrote and keeps saying is "LAW."

- chickens provide fresh eggs. It is hard for me to eat store bought eggs. even the ones at Natural food stores have unknown sources (and we know at least one organic company treats their cows, well, badly enough i think the people i've seen on video should go to jail for a long time). it is best i get them myself. this is partial sustainability.

- the reason the ordinance was said to be made was to keep people from having chickens in their backyard. once the Animal control board said it was b/c 'some' chickens are kept in unsanitary manner. well, following that rationale, all animals should be made illegal. it seems more rational to enforce the sanitary conditions for chickens the same way sanitary conditions are enforced for all animals in the city.

- chickens eat mosquitoes, ticks and many other insects. it is said that one won't need backyard fogger or an insectocuter. this is "GREEN" and our city is pushing "GREEN."

- just like dogs, not all hens are noisy. noisy ones can be culled. the "barking dog ordinance," as it is commonly called, applies to all animals.

- just like all animals, owners become attached to them.

- chickens kept in sanitary conditions pose no health threats (the people who believe their media and think a pandemic may start with four chickens in a backyard, please not reply). http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/country/cases_table_2010_04_09/en/index.html

- Myself and at least one other person called someone in one of the city dept's and were told chickens were "legal." i think limited to one dozen. this was last summer. but the law was said to be written in jan 2007. i wish i had printed the ordinances last fall as they read it was legal. it has changed and i swear something is fishy.

- they said they intend to enforce the ordinance based on complaints. as long as it is illegal to own a chicken, a neighbor will be prone to call a complaint in for just that. i called the Animal control and the man was adamant that ownership of chickens as illegal in a residential on property less than 1/4 acre.

- what else can i say to the commissioners to rescind the ordinance?
 
Last edited:
NOPE, sonoran chicken. and please i need facts i can bring tomorrow.

Animal control is bullying and strong arming the commissioners and the chicken owners. i don't know why but they are.

today, two men were physically threatening to the person who went to the A.C. dept asking for a print out of the complaint records. the same person who they ticketed and has brought this to the media. they said 419 complaints were issued against chickens in one year (all of NYC had 49 that same year). the animal control also said they've emailed the commissioners and even though they had no problem with chickens in town, they will now side with the animal control. this is strong arming. and the whole thing is very fishy.

everyone should check to see if this is happening in your town. looking in the database it is legal to have chickens. but calling their animal control it is illegal. the push from somewhere seems to be channeling through the animal control.

Animal control is using "health risks" associated with chickens. similar to laws passed against turtles b/c they carry salmonella (i agree with that law 100%). their rationale doesn't hold water. but i don't expect anything more from the dog catchers. if chickens carry diseases as said by the animal control (west nile virus and lime disease) ,,, so would pigeons. we've pigeons under most underpasses and on most grain elevators. Again, the rationale of the dog catchers doesn't hold water.

the animal control is also saying they spent one year researching the health risks associated with chickens and they don't want to have the law reversed. again, they are a dept of enforcement.

THis is all very bad.

the best argument said by our spokes person - as many people are still out of work or have taken part time jobs to replace full time good jobs, it helps the taxpayer if individuals can grow their own food. it is the poor who need the ability to sustain themselves. this ordinance restricts poor people from the ability to have chickens that will do just that. first hand i know there are children in the US whose parents don't have money to properly feed them, esp those parents who make enough not to qualify for aid but not enough to buy adequate food. to me, that is a serious health issue.
 
Last edited:
Do you have a copy of the law that was broken and used by AC.

Absent that and knowing exactly where this crap is going on it isn't likely for anyone here to be able to point you in the correct direction.
 
Quote:
the Fox - are you asking for the ordinance? the current one? sec 8-2-5 (f) . i think this link should get you close and if not, in the Municode search index, type "chicken."
http://library7.municode.com/default-now/home.htm?infobase=11818&doc_action=whatsnew

If you believe that page has been altered, you might use the Wayback Machine

http://www.archive.org/web/web.php

to pull up previous versions. Not all websites are archived, but many are.

MoSo -
Great Idea! using the archived website i did NOT find the article from Jan 2007. But using the current website, the article comes up. but, sadly, i can't get anything up in the "search box on the archived websites. maybe there is a different approach!

i'm not sure if archived websites retain their archived files. actually, i don't they do.
 
Ok, since we seem to be talking about a specific city and that city code defines chickens as barnyard fowl and that you have to be in specific zones to keep barnyard fowl and the only exception in residential areas is that up to four may be kept provided the residential lot is .25 acres or larger in size and that the barnyard fowl are restrained from leaving said lot and that all other nuisance and animal welfare ordinances must be obeyed.

Exactly what was the citation for?
 
While library.municode.com does not block the Internet Archive's spiders (there is no served robots.txt file) the coverage of their site in the wayback machine is very scanty.
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom