Quote:
Hi Dick,
Good thing that you added that second post. I wondered there for a moment why you'd left out so much of the information.
I do think that it's great that you're trying to be helpful, but I wonder how helpful to the fancy and the APA it will be in the longterm if you continue to spoonfeed nonmembers information that they should be joining in order to receive. I mean, this person in theory says she wants to create two new varieties, in effect, contributing to the fancy. I feel that people should put their money where their mouth is, and support the fancy first, even if it's by such a miniscule effort as simply buying a membership. After all, this is the fancy that will provide the framework and means for widespread recognition of her new creations, assuming that she's successful with making them and getting them accepted. We need to encourgae people to ask what they can do for the fancy, not what the fancy can do for them. As you know, lack of involvement is probably one of our biggest handicaps.