Actually the number of 500 birds per acre, or 87.12 square feet per bird, is not entirely correct.
I am a professional pastured poultry operator, as are a few of my friends. A more correct answer would be 500 birds per acre per week, or 87.12 square feet per bird per week. If the birds are not moved to a new patch of ground within a week, then the field will begin to show signs of severe damage. Furthermore, it is not wise to ever double back to the same patch of ground within the same year due to pathogens,
Hey, thanks for your input! Nice first post.
That works for me. This original number, 87.12 sq ft was indeed used under what we might today call a rotating paddock or 'pasture' rearing scheme. In later comments through the years, I've re-thought that number as lacking and subsequently rounded it UP to 100 sq ft per bird.
Before I moved to a home without chickens, I had over 600sq. ft/ bird and still saw that rotating them between separate paddocks would be wise. In fact, you probably know that this is a common feature of most permaculture schemes
(do they still call it "permaculture?")
I probably exceeded the space most hobbyists would ever consider, in fact. Many will say "free-ranging," offers the best plan, but it lacks one key feature:
control. These birds give us their best when we manage them, not when we allow them to run amok as unfettered spirits.
.
The truth is most backyard chickeneers don't employ rotation of ANY kind, opting instead for permanent siting. Its probably safest to say that 600 sq ft would be insufficient, in the long term, considering this.
But we need a place from which to start, since this discussion was focused on allowed space. I've used the example of 500/acre from the early range farmers for two reasons...
a. It gave us a number we could hinge on - people expect that. They want a fact, a piece of information they can build upon.
b. It was familiar to me - before the internet, I had the old books from men like John Robinson and Charles Weeks.
Many of the men of a hundred years ago did rotate from section to section on an annual basis, usually in trimesters. As you note this alows the ground to sweeten, the grass to regrow and the diseases of overcrowding to dispel. And we have to admit that it is a rather different thing to pasture and rotate, when compared to what most hobbyists do - a better thing, in my opinion - but definitely different.
Not all men did it back in the day, however, being driven by somewhat different forces than we envision today. Yet, they still did better than most today
might manage. Photos of the period bear this out.
Are you using some sort of movable housing, a la Joel Salatin, or have you come up with a another wrinkle?