Quote: How about some links to those a few of those "numerous amounts of literature" so we can read some of that "common knowledge", please
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Type in poultry range diseases on any search engine and you'll find many links. Here's a book example written by an avian veterinarian if you're interested: http://www.flemingoutdoors.com/diseases-of-free-range-poultry.htmlHow about some links to those a few of those "numerous amounts of literature" so we can read some of that "common knowledge", please
Quote: This says "dense aggregations" make catching the disease more likely, so it would spread faster in a confined flockin the breeding houses.
These are thought to spread the disease from carcasses of dead birds (possibly from neighboring backyards), improperly disposed.
Once the disease is introduced to a flock, it will stay until culling.
Chronic carriers can always lead to re-emerging of the disease in susceptible birds.
In wild birds, this disease most commonly associated with wetlands.
You failed to see the statement of mine from post #10, or conveniently omitted it in your reply:The book say chickens CAN get sick.
It doesn't say it's more likely if they are free ranged
I think that's an example of a statement with nothing to back it up, since I quickly found a source that disputes it, unless of course everyone free ranges on "wetlands"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fowl_cholera
This says "dense aggregations" make catching the disease more likely, so it would spread faster in a confined flock
I just don't think it's true, and you still haven't provided any links to back it up.
You just keep repeating it, even though I showed you a source that contradicted it
LOL
By the same token, you SAYING them doesn't make them true.
Still waitiing for links to the "numerous literature" that confirms it
I respectfully asked for LINKS to material you claimed exists, and all I've gotten is MORE CLAIMS.
I already gave some recommendations, but like many other threads you seem to occupy, you prefer discrediting others rather than discussing matters. It isn't my fault you refuse to acknowledge common sense and won't do your own research.
You're confusing TOTAL confinement practices with your supposed "well tended yard" and PRETENDING your method is truly "secure"
No confusion at all. Answer the question.
My chickens seldom go more than 100 yds in any direction from their coop, so the "acres" beyond that matter not at all
It is still beyond the yard.
If you think your setup is "more sanitary", you're deluding yourself
That's good, because it's becoming obvious you have none to provide, or you'd have simply shown them by now
No delusion at all. I never said "more sanitary". I said less probability of disease. I provided some info and you could research it on your own if you wanted to. You don't want to. You'd rather disregard common sense and argue. I won't spoon feed you. If you want to argue with common sense, I don't have any more time for you on this thread. This thread shouldn't become what you refuse to accept as reality anyway.
REAL "biosecurity" has NO OUTSIDE "YARDS":
http://www.caes.uga.edu/Publications/pubDetail.cfm?pk_id=7431
Real biosecurity methods can be practiced around the coop and yard. It is done all over the world.