I spend a LOT of time reading about nutrition and for the most part nutrition science is the WORST possible 'science' going.
Good nutrition studies are very, very expensive, nearly impossible to do and therefore are extremely hard to come by. They almost never stand up to the
Bradford Hill Criteria which is why you can find a study to support nearly every possible desired outcome (ever wonder why wine will kill you in one study and make you live longer in another - this is why)
BTW, smoking DOES stand up to the Bradford Hill Criteria which is how we can say pretty conclusively that it can
cause cancer, not just that it is
associated with it.
Many, many studies rely on food frequency questionnaires. Picture yourself answering this question "how many times have you eaten eggs (or broccoli, or spinach or beef) each month, for the last 12 years?"....umm hell if I know...yeah that is what they base a lot of studies on.
This article has a very particular anti-meat agenda. Dietary cholesterol has little effect on blood lipids and if you looked at the world health organization data it would show you that over populations higher cholesterol levels are concurrent with longer lives. The longest living woman lives(d) in Italy and eggs are all she eats -oh and cookies.
https://www.today.com/health/world-s-oldest-living-person-emma-morano-eats-eggs-every-t104523
Eat your eggs. They are one of the worlds cheapest, most accessible forms of protein and nutrients.