Is this true?

RendonRoo

Songster
10 Years
Feb 7, 2009
1,147
11
161
ft. worth
An older friend of mine told me that if a hen is breed that her eggs will have more good chloesterol and less bad. He was raised on a farm and swears by this. I've only read that you don't have to have a rooster for eggs.. Never heard this but felt like someone here could enlighten me on this. Thanks
 
some chickens lay eggs lower in cholestoral, so thats partially true..

and no you do not need a roo for a hen to lay.
but it helps, if i am not mistaken?
 
Those are usually hens are fed scientifically engineered feeds to produce specific results in their eggs. They are not eating common laying rations and feeds. I belive egglands best is one that claims high omega 3's and other health benefits from their eggs.
 
Here' an article that supports the theory that active, well fed hens do produce eggs that are higher in nutrition and have lower cholesteral. I do not know how absolutely scientific it is, Mother E N is a decent sort of place, they do have responsible people doing research to a degree, but I'm not going to say they are absolutely fool proof, but it sure makes sense to me!!!!

http://www.motherearthnews.com/Real-Food/2007-10-01/Tests-Reveal-Healthier-Eggs.aspx

I think it's logical that hens raised eating good food, give us better nutrition.
smile.png
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom