Jest Another Day in Pear-A-Dice - Higgins Rat Ranch Conservation Farm in Alberta

Pics
Heel low:

So better get on this genetics...gonna pick on White which is NO pigment...not black or red but nada pigments = white in feathers.

Let's understand what happens with variables and how the Punnett Squares help us with a small amount of variances, say two or three but more than that and we can end up with headaches, eh.

I often get to sound harsh but the reality is when you go outside two genetically similar birds (as in a breed/variety) bred together, the exponential expected outcomes with each difference ADDED to the equation are unfathomable for many to grasp.

Difficult breeding the same recognized breeds and same varieties together...now it gets WAY complex when you wanna mix up breeds, varieties...here's a small window in on the "possible crosses" as outcomes.

ONE difference in the parents results in potential of 4 outcomes in the kids / TWO differences between the parents = 16 outcomes in the progeny...just THREE differences = 64 outcomes, and so it goes. When you cross breeds you are crossing different shapes...when you cross varieties, you are crossing different colour patterns (sometimes combs, sometimes muffs/beard). Because we have studied and segregated the colour genetics out more than say what makes a breed a breed (shape and other characteristics), playing with colour genetics as in varieties is a bit easier...a bit to do.

So one of the more simple varieties to create and do well for exhibition purposes is the White bird...but genetically speaking, a White bird can be hiding any number of mutations, but let's look at just the ones that make up the WHITE part of the colour equation.

For a White feathered bird, there are an assortment of any SIX different mutations PLUS White feathers can be based on ANY e-series of the FIVE known different alleles...never mind what makes up "wild type" as just the base on a chicken. So you have SEVEN variances...let's just keep it simple and look at a maximum of THREE variances since that gives you 64 different outcomes on the three...never mind the SEVEN in a White bird (if that bird just happens to be wild type UNDER that white--could be a ton of other mutations hidden to bite you and ouch!).
lau.gif


Add one trait difference--monohybrid cross or one factor cross, there are FOUR outcomes possible...matrix is 2x2 (AA x aa); AA Aa aa. A typical ratio for phenotypes (simple dominant versus recessive) in the F2's are 3:1 and genotypes is 1:2:1.


Add two traits difference--a dihybrid cross or two factors, there are SIXTEEN outcomes possible...matrix is 4x4 (AaBb x AaBb); AaBb AaBB aaBb aabb. A typical ratio for phenotypes in the F2's is 9:3:3:1 and genotype is 1:2:2:4:2:2:3:1.


Add three traits difference--a trihybrid cross or three factors, there are SIXTY FOUR outcomes possible...matrix is 8x8 (AaBbCc x AaBbCc). AABBCC AaBbCc AaBBCc AaBBCC AaBbcc aaBbCc aaBcCC aabbcc. A typical genotype ratio of 1:2:1:2:4:2:1:2:1:2:4:2:4:8:4:2:4:2:1:2:1:2:4:2:1:2:1 (1 AABBCC : 2 AABBCc : 1 AABBcc : 2 AABbCC : 4 AABbCc : 2 AABbcc : 1 AAbbCC : 2 AAbbCc : 1 AAbbcc : 2 AaBBCC : 4 AaBBCc : 2 AaBBcc : 4 AaBbCC : 8 AaBbCc : 4 AaBbcc : 2 AabbCC : 4 AabbCc : 2 Aabbcc : 1 aaBBCC : 2 aaBBCc : 1 aaBBcc : 2 aaBbCC : 4 aaBbCc : 2 aaBbcc : 1 aabbCC : 2 aabbCc : 1 aabbcc) and phenotype ratio of 27:9:9:9:3:3:3:1 (27 ABC : 9 ABc : 9 AbC : 9 aBC : 3 Abc : 3 aBc : 3 abC : 1 abc).


You see where this is going fast??
th.gif



I did a trihybrid cross on paper for one colour pattern of our heritage turkeys here...I crossed two heterozygous parents...identical to each other...Blue Red Slate turkey x Blue Red Slate turkey...for the FUN of it and because I can...I doubt I would do it again, but it was fun to fill out that many outcomes and see the patterns. I have a mathematical brain that needs to be used or lost...SIXTY FOUR boxes to fill in the matrix...we are talking FUN times, eh.
tongue.png




Recessive White is c/c


Self White may hide anything and everything under the NO pigment. I spent five years breeding my bantam White Wyandottes to learn what colour genetics were hiding under the recessive white. Read that...FIVE years test breeding ONE strain so that I could BEGIN my real blood bantam Chantecler project. Five years before even beginning the standard sized to bantam size project and I am getting geared up now for the fifth generation on those next.

Watching the F4's grow up now...got Self-Whites and those are some of the easiest of the varieties to make. I have count them and weep...three birds right now that I am holding hopes on...TWO females and ONE male after years and years and hundreds of birds later...ask me how many thousands of dollars down a black hole to make. Yeh, one trio of potential breeders. I am so proud of those three...but I also know the cost to make them, eh. I have another two pairs in reserve but in reality, any time you mess with colours as in varieties, it takes a while to get back on track never mind if you choose to CROSS breeds which I choose to do rarely and only with good reason.

I also have one male and four females in the self-Buffs...in the Partridge, quite a few but not ready to begin making selections for breeders...just need a bit more time seeing what they have to offer us, this F4 generation.


For some fun...go here...click on buttons, expand to five traits...see all the purdy colours...kewl eh!

http://scienceprimer.com/punnett-square-calculator

"Number of traits in cross:"

You can go as high as five different traits...yeh thought three was kewl...how about 256 outcomes, eh? That's why we use calculators to do the messy calculations but before you should be allowed to use a computer to figure out a problem, you should have to count on yer fingees and toesies a few times to appreciate the complexities of this.
lol.png



Press the "Show Frequencies" button to see the percentages of each displayed in an array of different colours.
big_smile.png


They have set this up to display colours for each difference...you may be able to SEE what I SEE in patterns as far as numbers and letters (big/little ones in genetic matrixes)...I don't need to see the colours to enjoy the patterns made...that is where my brain goes. Yours may or may not...we all learn at different rates and ways...jest so long as we LEARN!


Let us go learn now... Now that we bin scared into paying attention...er running away screaming...
big_smile.png


Doggone & Chicken UP!

Tara Lee Higgins
Higgins Rat Ranch Conservation Farm, Alberta, Canada
 
Heel low:

Breed a White chicken to a White chicken and you expect...


All White chickens...statistically, two boys, two girls, even number in genders and all White kids.




So we see the phenotype above, let us do the Punnett Square matrix...the genetics




Mom and Dad chicken will each contribute one little c...so we place these in the matrix




Carry the little c's across and down...we see 100% of the offspring in the outcome will be c/c...White in phenotype




Place the phenotype, what the birds look like as the progeny or outcome...




And there we have the first of the Punnett Squares of breeding recessive White (c/c) to recessive White (c/c)


See how under each of the babies, I have the genotype listed for you to see...two males and two females and all are c/c.

Pretty kewl eh...
cool.png


That be the first shot at this.

Next will be coloured to coloured. We CAN do this...
celebrate.gif


Doggone & Chicken UP!

Tara Lee Higgins
Higgins Rat Ranch Conservation Farm, Alberta, Canada
 
I'm not running I'm re-reading....

Good, let it soak...soak in...let it just meld with yah.

We will do the coloured ones next and it is a repeat of the White...but in a dif colour...let it slowly go in and be there.

Gotta run me bus...see when I get time to post the coloured up ones, eh.

Then it gets a bit more complicated...har har har...but not too scary.
hugs.gif


Tara
 
Just think thats only for color... not any one of the other traits people breed for.


I read an interesting study on breeding for specific traits a while back. In Russia they breed foxes for fur... Yeh I know... But there is a problem with this whole process. Foxes never domesticate... they are not domesticated and may tolerate you they require care when handling them.

A geneticist thought.... Hmmm what if we breed only foxes that are easy to handle.... then breed the progeny of those foxes that are the easiest to handle. It took generations. But guess what happened....

Yes they became more domestic.... but also Their color changed and they became more dog like.

http://cbsu.tc.cornell.edu/ccgr/behaviour/Index.htm

We do something similar with chickens. or Did. If you look at the wild behavior of the foundation breeds Like jungle fowl. There are actually two types I dont remember the names.... One comes from india and one comes from Indonesia... I believe.

But in the process of domestication these birds went from good fliers and foragers light in weight and good at raising up their young....

We humans selectively changed their colors, combs, height, weight, egg size, etc... Its amazing how much we could coax out of a single species... or two.

deb
 
Just think thats only for color... not any one of the other traits people breed for.


I read an interesting study on breeding for specific traits a while back. In Russia they breed foxes for fur... Yeh I know... But there is a problem with this whole process. Foxes never domesticate... they are not domesticated and may tolerate you they require care when handling them.

A geneticist thought.... Hmmm what if we breed only foxes that are easy to handle.... then breed the progeny of those foxes that are the easiest to handle. It took generations. But guess what happened....

Yes they became more domestic.... but also Their color changed and they became more dog like.

Any inherited trait my Dear Deb. I can do the Punnett Squares for skin colour, egg colour, crossed beaks, tufts, short legs, multi spurs, something as untaggable as maybe "longevity" or "disease resistance"... I get that something as big as disease resistance is a wide open thing...but if we could determine if was recessive/dominant or incompletely dom...we could work thru it in a Punnett Square on it.

The reason you see us predicting COLOUR is because it is WAY simpler in many aspects and more understood than other factors that are inherited. Dr. Carefoot tells us to master colour first because, well uh, we will always be in pursuit of better type...we can and DO fix colour in a chicken or bird and then we go off in hot pursuit of other aspects...but if you can set the colour pattern, away you go to get the other wants...of which there are so many and so many interpretations of a GOOD animal or bird, eh.
tongue.png


PS's are used more often I see for simple dom / rec and certainly for blue dilution (incompletely dom or incompletely rec...means the same thing, eh). It is good for one or two traits, it gets too complex and tedious on three or more. But it begins us some place to build upon...we can go to calculators for traits...that is what Henk's chicken calculator does and if you do the PS manually at first, you develop a huge bit of respect for Henk and the FREE gift he bestowed upon us...there are even areas in his site for horses and cats and and and...amazing!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punnett_square:

This link here below is a baby set walk thru Punnett Squares. Don't let the name baby deter you...if you already know it all...consider it a good review and see if the writer screwed up any place, eh.

http://www.hobart.k12.in.us/jkousen/Biology/psquare.htm



I was thinking, does someone want me to do a step by step thru a Punnett Square, how you fill it out, move by move...'cause I can probably do something in the paint program and save each step and post it, one by one?
hu.gif





I too saw the one on the foxes...was on a tv program and the foxes...where they some sorta black mix...my mind wants to picture black with white points.

Yeh, us humans have ruined some animals to the point where some of the "farm" animals will actually get picked up in a flood, turn over, not struggle and drown! Yikes...too easy to handle, no fight left to live. I prefer the wild ones more...not the ones that HUNT me mind you...but the feisty ones are not looked upon as jerks by me or Rick. Sure I do smile at the ones that hop up to visit me...but not if its a 150 ewe thanks...no hopping ON me thanks! Too friendly and they get under foot...a respectable distance.

I don't need to mug, maul, hug and get kissed by the creatures. If I need to pet something, dogs suffice for that need...Fixins and her soft fur, Foamy and her wanna get a pet. No chicken kisses...BLICK!
tongue.png


Gotta go again...

Doggone & Chicken UP!

Tara Lee Higgins
Higgins Rat Ranch Conservation Farm, Alberta, Canada
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom