There was a lot of that at the time I was teaching my kids. I tried to believe it, too. It would have been better if I had not.  The whole creationism thing goes back to the Calvinists and the split of Protestants from Roman Catholic. (I guess I'm neither, nor Arminian either, really.) About that time the Bible was translated into modern languages. A lot of people who didn't understand literature started interpreting it for themselves.
Many of the Protestant clergy understood the Creation story as it was (I believe) intended; as heaven-inspired sacred mythic literature expounding on the human condition. These clerics and theologians had no problem with evolution when it came to the fore.
There later rose to prominence certain less-classically educated leaders, who insisted on the literal interpretation of pretty much everything. The Bible could be understood by anyone, they taught, because it meant precisely, literally what it said. This movement became exceedingly popular and remains so to this day but, as CS Lewis said, "The Bible is a book that was written for grown-ups." Things are neither as simple nor as complicated as many have been led to believe, imo.
That's why you saw those charts. I am more Christian now than I was then or, for that matter, more than I was yesterday. But no, you don't offend me.
Since you posted publicly I wanted to answer publicly, but if you (or anyone else) want to continue the conversation we should probably do it privately.