- Thread starter
- #21
I know its to limit more fast food places, I am okay with limitations, but am I correct to say that these places also have healthier options (granted, I am not talking organic or excellent quality) than a "Big Mac and Fries"? I mean, all of these also have salads and such so people DO have options. To say that all these poor people are unhealthy because of the fast food places and lack of healthy food is ridiclous. They can still go to McDonalds and get a salad, but they CHOOSE not to.
I am upset at the bigger picture. Limiting or preventing new is just a small step toward the government banning things. It is not the governments place to tell us as adults what we can and cannot eat or where...and now that they have started doing this, where will it end? Its just another step on the road going downhill like someone said- communisim.
I am upset at the bigger picture. Limiting or preventing new is just a small step toward the government banning things. It is not the governments place to tell us as adults what we can and cannot eat or where...and now that they have started doing this, where will it end? Its just another step on the road going downhill like someone said- communisim.