Quote:
It does make sense -- it's just a different perspective than you may be used to.
When the French say "Marans", they have a specific definition for the term. The French definition of the word "Marans" goes something like this: "a bird that meets the French standard for Marans with no disqualifications, which can also lay at least a #4 egg at some point during its laying cycle". If the bird doesn't meet those specifications, then it doesn't fulfill the requirements for the "Marans" label. If you want to say it as "non-standard Marans" or "Marans failure" or something like that, I don't personally care. But you should understand that the French perspective on how they define breeds is not unique to the Marans. They have the same sort of perspective, for instance, on dog breeds, and most likely on other types of livestock as well. Also, it is not unheard of for performance requirements to be placed on breeds here in the US, either. For instance, certain horse breeds must exhibit certain gaits before they can be labeled as a specific breed -- and so on.