Quote:
Your opinion, or a rhetorical question?
First, if you are depending upon the post office to bring you your new broilers every spring then you are not practicing sustainable agriculture. And if you can't get the parent stock for your flock then you are dependent upon the post office. If the post office or their mail-carriage contractor ever does quit carrying day-old chicks then you have a huge problem.
Second, if your bottom line is driven strictly by profit then go right on ahead. Tyson's and Foster Farms pretty well have that market cornered, though; you can't go head to head with them and do any good. You need to find a niche and compete against them in that niche. For some, that niche is in the heritage breeds that people ate when they visited grandma and grandpa on the farm.
Third, the parent stock for the Cornish X (and White Leghorns and $FOO Stars, for that matter) is inbred to a farethewell. If that inbreeding ever results in a loss of fertility or any other situation where the numbers aren't there to support small sales then your problem is as big as if the post office ever quit carrying day-old chicks.
Fourth, genetic diversity has been all but eliminated in the production crossbreeds. That not only has the result of eliminating production variability, it also reduces or eliminates the varying resistance to disease. If a disease should target one of the major suppliers of parent stock then they would, essentially, be wiped out unless and until they could breed up resistant strains. And those producers depending on them would suffer too.
Fifth, the dual-purpose breeds you sneer at so earnestly do not need anything like the intensive management your beloved Cornish X do. When my Red Stars (crossbreeds between two different dual-purpose breeds) got here I opened the box, checked for pasting-up, and put them in front of a feeder full of chick feed, and they ate until they were full then stopped. The feeder in the chicken house is full and will stay full tonight. I don't need to worry that they will eat themselves into leg problems or ascites. I can enjoy them both as they scratch around in the yard and as they simmer in a soup pot on the stove once they have been replaced.
Sixth, older birds make much better soup than young ones do both because they do have a fuller richer flavor and because their meat has some tooth after it has simmered for two or three days. It is not a big deal if the bird takes twice as long to grow to half the size if it has ten times the flavor.
It is good that chicken-keeping is broad enough to compass both the person making at least part of their livelihood from it and the person keeping a few for the sheer enjoyment of it. I hope that in these six answers to your opinion I have given you some food for thought, aggieterpkatie.
RSD