Quote:
Although I've never been involved in drafting such ordinances, I've read many news clippings and posts here describing what different municipalities have proposed.
The most basic rules limit the number of hens and don't allow roosters. Some require a permit from the municipality to generate revenue towards animal control. Fair enough.
Many go way too far:
Some folks can't stand the idea that somebody may actually raise, and then eat, a chicken. So they pass ordinances that say you are not allowed to slaughter any chicken on your premises.
They propose unreasonable setbacks for housing and ranging of birds to keep the birds as far away from neighboring residences as possible. It doesn't matter that there no such restrictions for other pets, such as dogs.
They feel they need to keep it humane and stipulate arbitrary "humane" requirements such as the amount of space required (no more than 10 birds per acre, or other such nonsense). They stipulate housing requirements (housing must provide a minimum of 4 sq ft per bird). Some ordinances I've seen get very detailed as to animal husbandry requirements, probably due to some well meaning backyard chicken "experts" helping to draft the ordinances.
My least favorite are ordinances that say that you are allowed to keep chickens if you get permission from 50% of your neighbors. This is a very common one, but the one I find the most ridiculous.
I agree, I don't need to ask my neighbors permission if I'd like to get a new dog (who might howl everytime a siren is heard, bark in the night, have stinky bowel movements, or shed so much fur that it blows into the neighbors yard...)