Marek's Disease is not painful for the bird "suffering" the symptoms. Frustration, because they cannot move, first offbalanced, then not at all, is all the bird is troubled with. It is a nerve disease and apparently deadens the feeling.
I'm not 100% sure of that. Many nerve diseases cause pain and suffering. Chickens rarely show suffering though.
@George: I guess we just have different viewpoints on this. I've read that the heritability of resistance to Mareks' is very strong, many vets recommend breeding your own resistant stock as being better than vaccinating for that very reason, hence my belief it's worth doing and easily achievable. Each to their own though.
The deed is done. I started with 30 ml of vodka tubed. 30 minutes later her head is drooping, and I used an ax She never knew. I like the vodka idea. I used 30 ml, it worked on a chicken that had no fat left on her body.
I held her during that time.
Sorry for your loss.
Is there any concern that getting the chicken intoxicated would interfere with for example blood and liver tests? Just a thought, since vodka can be used against bacteria and some other things like that, as a disinfectant...
Thanks for clarifying the comment about wild birds carrying MDV. I haven't done that much reading up on it, obviously.
This thread has probably inspired me to do more reading up on it than I've ever done before, and so much info on it is not couched in definitive terms, just probabilities, which makes it difficult to stand behind any aspect of 'fact' regarding the disease.
On that topic, though, regarding MDV being only a disease of chickens, from what I've read that is again just a strong probability, not proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Quote: Source:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC415139/
Hardly strong wording there, lol!
I know it can infect quail sometimes, apparently Marek's also occasionally infects geese, egrets, ducks and Great Horned Owls (according to PubMed), and we know it's rapidly adapting, so how do we know for sure it isn't more widely contagious, or won't become so? As with so much else about the disease, the incontrovertible rules are few and far between.
Quote:
(Note: they didn't find MDV in the penguins but didn't rule out the possibility).
Source:
http://www.marineornithology.org/PDF/29_1/29_1_8.pdf
While reading up on this I also came across info on lions with canine distemper antibodies... Heard about that years ago, since it was on the news, most of you probably heard about it too, but I'd forgotten. Also came across info on quail-chicken hybrids used in studies. Did not know such things existed, or, once again, forgot if I had known before, but as with fertile sheep-goat hybrids, it seems scientists use these 'impossibilities' in studies while the rest of the world remains convinced they are actual impossibilities.
Some random info:
Quote: "...However, there are cases of a transfer of virus lineages between distantly related hosts (
Ehlers et al., 2007;
Ehlers et al., 2008a). Altogether, the phylogenetic data clearly indicate a very narrow host range and specificity of herpesviruses but show at the same time that there is a residual potential to cross host species barriers and to adapt to new hosts (
Ehlers et al., 2008b), which raises the question of the present and possibly future zoonotic potential of herpesviruses..."
"...Zoonoses naturally occur more frequently among closely related host species, but transmissions of disease agents can also be found where barriers of transmission are inherently low or artificially lowered. Examples for such lowering of barriers of transmission are close contacts of humans to animals living in zoos or Safari Parks or situations where pets live in the same household with their owners..."
"...Yet another alphaherpesvirus,
Gallid herpesvirus 2 (GaHV-2, Marek’s disease virus), was claimed to be involved in human infections. First, a connection was postulated in some reports between GaHV-2 infection and multiple sclerosis (
McStreet et al., 1992). Another study reported that human serum samples apparently tested GaHV-2-positive by PCR (
Laurent et al., 2001). The results, however, could not be reproduced by other research groups and must therefore be deemed inconclusive (
Hennig et al., 1998;
Hennig et al., 2003). At least, there is no formal proof or even likelihood of an infection of humans with this avian herpesvirus that is capable of infecting host species other than the chicken, namely the turkey and the quail."
Source:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2815145/
Some info on Marek's which may or may not have new info for some people:
Quote:
http://www.veterinaryresearch.org/content/45/1/36
(Note: this last link here is a good, more thorough read-up than you can get in most other places)
Some more info on Marek's... Now THIS is a concern to me. I have people with multiple autoimmune diseases in my family and I did not know we could develop antibodies to these diseases, since I thought there would not be a reason for that...
Quote:
Author information ► Copyright and License information ►
This article has been
cited by other articles in PMC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the prevalence of antibodies against Marek's disease herpes virus (MDV) and against avian leukosis viruses type C (ALV) in groups of workers exposed to poultry and in unexposed groups.
METHODS: Antibodies directed against avian viral proteins were detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay in 549 subjects. Exposure to chickens was high in two subgroups: farmers on intensive chicken farms and workers at chicken slaughterhouses. One subgroup, traditional farmers on dairy or pig farms with poultry, had moderate exposure to poultry. Another subgroup, farmers and slaughterhouse workers on quail farms, had high exposure to quails. Three subgroups were not exposed to chickens: farmers on dairy or pig farms without poultry, workers at cattle slaughterhouses, and white collar workers.
Also, MDV antibodies were tested after serum sample adsorption with chicken antigens in 134 serum samples. RESULTS: The prevalence of antibodies against MDV was significantly higher in the exposed subgroups than in unexposed groups (odds ratio (OR) 6.17; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.91-9.75). No association was found between seroprevalence and age.
However, higher prevalence was found among women and was related to duration of exposure to chickens.
The concentration of antibodies from a few subjects remained very high after adsorption. Significant differences between the men and women were found for the prevalence of antibodies for ALV but were not related to exposure to chickens.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of antibodies against MDV was significantly higher among workers exposed to chickens and was related to sex and duration of exposure. The higher prevalence of antibodies against avian oncogenic viruses found among women compared with men may be induced by differences in exposure or by genetic factors. The meaning of these high titres could be related to the presence of MDV in humans. Because the involvement of animal oncogenic viruses in human cancer is indicated by epidemiological and some experimental studies, the integration of viral DNA in human cells needs to be investigated.
Source:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1128497/
Quote: Quote:
Interesting that they believe it's a risk, I hadn't heard anything but denials of it being a risk before that.
Anyway, some random info to look though.
Best wishes.