Somebody stole my two chicken carriers, a 3-hole and a 4-hole wire carrier from the show hall. Really not impressive.
Sorry. I always fear such things will happen when people are around-- sorry, they sound like they were nice carriers.
I know this show is now over but when I looked at Dan Castle winning English Champ I see to many comb points on his birds, he's got 6 maybe 7 points can't tell by pic but it's still to many points for real Australorps... Real Australians have 4-5 points plus a thicker body. These awards go to the popular breeders not the ones who know there breeds.
Combs are not nearly as important as other features. . . . and the deduction isas I understand it less than a point. ( As long as myroosters have 4-5 point, I'm good; Mr 8 point is out unless he has something I really need. ). THe judges can only judge the birds that are entered. ANd since the judge cannot know the name of the owner/breeders as only entry numbers not names are on the cards how can such a bias be implimented in general?
I realize it is possible. People are human; we all have biases even if we try not to.
In Holland, a judge must stand down, when his stallion is being presented for consideration. Everyone knows who owns the stallion. IT still goes thru the same process. ANd honestly I bet that stallion had better be something special. In the case I am thinking of, that stallion was creme del a creme, best of the best, and was approved in the following year with remarkable scores.
I watched the judging for a while at NEPC. IT is hard work. Pulling two birds out at a time, looking at 8-10 birds, then putting them in order . . . not a job for me!! I appreciate the great knowledge the judges must have to do this. Are some judges better than others, probably, even likely. BUT they can only select from the birds entered . . .