Thanks to both of you for your input on incubators. Unfortunately, I have to incubate quite a bit but really love having broodies just so that I don't have to raise the chicks. I've used the cheap Styrofoam incubators, and although they work just fine, they take a lot of effort on the part of the human. Constantly watching humidity (although I found a humidity kit at Incubator Warehouse which would probably work well) and constantly verifying the temperature. So, finally, this year I am getting a Sportsman 1502 from Santa. It is sitting under the tree now and you can't imagine how hard it is for me not to open it and start messing around with it.As someone who has used both economy models as well as top of the line incubators, no one seems to realize that when you shell out $1,500 or more for a mechanical setting hen, then you likely already have a good understanding of incubation basics. At the commercial level 100% efficacy is the goal, 95% is often the reality, and 90% is acceptable, but just barely. The reality is, no one reading these words would patronize a doctor if 20-30 present of his patients croaked during the first 21 days.
I am not surprised that in one study that the smaller hens were deemed the better mothers. I had an idea that could be the case because of previous experiences, but I didn't have enough experience with big hens to allow me to say anything.
The incubator rooms in large hatcheries are climate controlled so that the incubators are not constantly cycling on and off trying to maintain the Goldie Locks' zone of 99.5 degrees.
Another consideration for hatching, particularly shipped eggs, is altitude. It isn't mentioned very much, but there are plenty of good studies on the viability of eggs from sea level that are taken up to altitude for hatching. Not very good results for the shipped eggs and my own experience bears that out. While I'll usually hatch 80% of the eggs that I set from my own hens, my hatch rate for shipped eggs is generally less than 10%. The only reason that it is close to 10% is because the broodies tend to hatch out a few more of the shipped eggs than the incubator does (about 6% for the incubator), but still the failure rate is astounding. Almost all are quitters around day 15, so it isn't a fertility problem or even a shipping problem. In all of the research that I've done about it, seems that there is less oxygen at altitude and the eggs from sea level are not "accustomed" to less oxygen. I've tried to wrap my head around that hypothesis, and although I can see how that might be the case I also wonder how the eggs that are laid at altitude don't have a low oxygen problem as well.
So, that is the reason for the Sportsman. Since the eggs are giving off CO2 as they mature, removing as much CO2 from the incubator as possible will increase oxygen levels. Because of the size of the Sportsman (244 chicken eggs) I can give the eggs lots of space, which should increase their oxygen levels. I also put soda lime in the incubator to absorb CO2, hopefully also increasing the oxygen levels. I had a chance to talk to a commercial scientist this fall, he consults with a hatchery in the Denver area and said that they pump oxygen into their incubators and have increased their hatch rate to 95% (they also get all of their eggs from altitude). Anyway, TMI, but I thought I'd share a little of my experience/knowledge as well, particularly about high altitude hatching.