There has been some change over time in what various folks have called silver pied -- several years ago, the definitions tended to focus only on the amount of white on the bird -- the 80 - 90% white. I think that article was originally written back then. It's a very good article, but perhaps may not completely reflect contemporary thinking on terminology. More recently, there has been discussion as to whether a bird must show silvering on the back in order to be properly called silver pied, and attempts to distinguish birds with silvering from birds without silvering.
Recently I saw that someone was describing some birds as "dark silver pied" which would have been a contradiction in terms under the old definition, but which was apparently an attempt to categorize a bird with (I assume) visible but not extensive white that perhaps also had the "silvering" effect on its colored feathers. I had to wonder if the bird was what other folks would call a pied white-eye (or perhaps dark pied white-eye)?
There has been a longstanding debate about the genetics of silver pied, as well as a certain amount of debate about the white-eye gene, its role in "silver pied" and possible variants of the white-eye gene.
Honestly, if there's not a solid consensus on what phenotype constitutes silver pied (i.e., what markings must a bird have to be a "silver pied" bird), then sorting out the genotype becomes impossible.
Individual breeders can perhaps figure out what genes their own birds are likely to be carrying... but when different folks call birds with different markings (caused by different gene combinations) by the same name -- as in the question of whether silvering is necessary or not necessary -- then things get really confusing really fast