I just wanted to say, in the least hateful way possible, that many libertarians do not support the right to keep chickens. I respect their right to believe that, but I still hope no one is under the impression that since they follow a strict NAP (Non Aggression Principle), they support the right to own almost any property without government interference. They don't. They can easily redefine the noise from a rooster as aggression against property since it is possible that it would devalue property.
This isn't to stir up hate; it's just to let you know.
I feel like it's one thing to rant and another to inform people, and I feel like chicken enthusiasts deserve to know how the NAP actually works in case they're under the impression that freedom = chickens.