Quote:
Told a Chinese kid to get up and open/close the door, I expect
In principle it is possible to use a controlled drip of water to open or close a precisely-counterweighted door, but it would have to be reset each time. Indeed I think pretty much anything you came up with that was nonelectrical would have to be reset each time, and some of the electrical ones too.
Frankly I think it is good for the character to have to get up at 6 a.m. or whenever, and be home at dusk, to take care of something. So much of the rest of the modern world is built around "I should be able to do whatever I want whenever I want", it is GOOD to be reminded of the natural chronology of the workings of the world
(Except that I think it is quite legitimate for people whose jobs keep them away from the coop at door-opening or door-closing time to want/need an auto opener, of course!)
JMHO,
Pat
You have nailed the crux of it, Pat. At some point, energy must be input and decisions made (controls applied). We initially solve these with muscle and brain, working together, like this...
"Oh, its morning - chickens need to be let out. Lets go open the door..." then later,
"Oh look, it's evening - chickens must be shut up. Lets go close the door..."
In this time-tested scenario, we provide
both the control and the power through our physical action. Okay, we know that. But I'm after some degree of non-electrical automation for that, right? Electrical power is useful, abundant and relatively cheap. So much so, in fact, that we have grown to utterly depend on it for everything. But it sometimes fails and then is useless. SO alternatives are worth investigating.
The water drip would work, after a fashion, and I've thought that one out - along with its attendant pitfalls. A possibility, yes, but with enough troubles so that I consider it 2nd tier.
A gravity operated, kinetic mechanism, a la cuckoo clockwork, has potential. Ditto a spring wound mechanism of some sort.
Either one could likely give you several days worth of operation on a single input of energy.
The rub comes when, as you suggest, we want to time the process over a recurring 24 hour period. A timer becomes a must at that point, and I'm unaware of any non-electrical timers that don't require human intervention at some point. The classic wind-up alarm clock is a prime example.
So, we'll agree that you must remain involved in the mechanism if you are to eschew gross amounts of electrical power. Well and good, then.
I've reached the conclusion, that a timed actuator of low power consumption, either battery or solar powered , could perform the needed control tasks. Meanwhile, the movement of mass (the door) could be accomplished by balanced weight and kinetic energy. The door doesn't have to move far (1 foot) and gravity could do that in one direction. So we only need enough input energy to move the door one foot the other way. Stored kinetic energy could do that.
So we end up with a hybrid design of some sort, a little electricity properly applied, and the remaining energy mechanically provided. Further development along these lines is needed, although I have formed some crude ideas already.
If in the end, if we only provide a
one way device which requires a once daily input from us, well.... it's an improvement.
You know that I agree with you most of the time - and this is one of those times.
That which doesn't kill us, makes us stronger.