FeatherAndBloom
Songster
I have to agree! Seems unnecessary and like there’s probably another less risky option that serves for anti-caking. Risk/reward for DE and mite protection is probably higher, especially in the coop environment nooks and crannies.My concern is that even the food grade DE can contain silica, and chicken feed is *always* dusty. Which means the chickens are going to be inhaling DE. Now, the studies show that mammalian lungs can get rid of food grade DE pretty quickly, but chickens have air sacs, not lungs, which do not have the same ability to quickly remove any dust or particles that they inhale. Mammals have cilia which is always moving and pushing particles out and then we cough it out. Birds don’t work that way, they use their immune system’s macrophages to go in and basically eat the particles to get rid of them, and birds in general do not tolerate breathing in many of the same things mammals do.
DE in chicken feed is probably used for anti-caking properties, but I just don’t like it in such a dusty environment where chickens are sticking their faces and inhaling it. They have enough issues with dusty areas, why add something additional to their food that has the potential to cause issues, even a small potential?