Eh, you can quibble all you like about Oh, it doesn't fully solve all possible problems in all possible situations.
So what.
Bottom line: popcan style heaters are TOTALLY FREE, you just have to collect stuff lying around, and does not require working electrical service.
And I don't really care what your paper calculations come up with... you just come over here and stand in the outflow breeze from my front run and tell me it's not warming anything up, or shut it one day and open it the next and look at the difference in coop temperatures. I believe you are failing to account for all relevant factors, such as the fact that you can build them BIG for larger coops and the fact that a fair bit of northern heating season takes place in months with longer daylength than early January has.
Even if a person lives somewhere real cold and have to use some additional electrical heating for some of the year because your coop is small, something is better than nothing, if you ask me.
I wonder if you are coming at this from the perspective of opinions on passive-solar features for *houses*, which often do not work all that well because they are subject to very different design constraints and requirements and so forth?
Passive solar house performance does not actually have a huge lot to do with *chicken coops*
(for instance, the volume to be heated is often vastly smaller in comparison to collector area; nighttime temperature drops are not such a problem in coops; and the cost of a popcan style heater will usually be approximately $0, so the performance criteria for 'usefulness' are much lower in coops)
Pat
So what.
Bottom line: popcan style heaters are TOTALLY FREE, you just have to collect stuff lying around, and does not require working electrical service.
And I don't really care what your paper calculations come up with... you just come over here and stand in the outflow breeze from my front run and tell me it's not warming anything up, or shut it one day and open it the next and look at the difference in coop temperatures. I believe you are failing to account for all relevant factors, such as the fact that you can build them BIG for larger coops and the fact that a fair bit of northern heating season takes place in months with longer daylength than early January has.
Even if a person lives somewhere real cold and have to use some additional electrical heating for some of the year because your coop is small, something is better than nothing, if you ask me.
I wonder if you are coming at this from the perspective of opinions on passive-solar features for *houses*, which often do not work all that well because they are subject to very different design constraints and requirements and so forth?
Passive solar house performance does not actually have a huge lot to do with *chicken coops*

Pat