I just bought my first incubator. I wanted a Hovabator Genesis with all the bells and whistles, but I could afford the Farm Innovator Pro 4200 http://www.tractorsupply.com/en/sto...-series-circulated-air-incubator?cm_vc=-10005 . I knew the thermostat would be questionable so I bought this hygrometer at Walmart today http://www.walmart.com/ip/AcuRite-Digital-Humidity-and-Temperature-Monitor/16888914
The bator came with a glass thermometer inside and a dial one on the outside that says "For Reference Only". I took the dial one apart and calibrated it to match the room temp/humidity displayed on the digital hygrometer so they would start at the same place and see what happened. I am warming it up for the first time right now. At first there was disparity between the digital and the dial. The dial seemed to register heat much faster. But now the digi reads 100 and the dial reads 101. The glass thermometer though reads 115! I actually expected "old school" tech to be pretty infallible - wow was I wrong! Surely one of the other two is actually more accurate right? So which one should be trusted?
Thanks for any input
ETA: OK, it got even weirder. I turned down the temp dial and the glass thermometer immediately began registering a drop, the dial a little more slowly, but the digi stayed at 108 for along time. It still said 104 when the others reached 100. So maybe the digi is crapola? Maybe the glass one actually IS more receptive/fast/accurate?? Maybe it really was 115 when it said it was? And the digi is reading 25% humidity while the dial is reading 35%?
ETA - again - Tossing the digi. I took it out and put it in front of the A/C and it took forever to register any change
Now what...
The bator came with a glass thermometer inside and a dial one on the outside that says "For Reference Only". I took the dial one apart and calibrated it to match the room temp/humidity displayed on the digital hygrometer so they would start at the same place and see what happened. I am warming it up for the first time right now. At first there was disparity between the digital and the dial. The dial seemed to register heat much faster. But now the digi reads 100 and the dial reads 101. The glass thermometer though reads 115! I actually expected "old school" tech to be pretty infallible - wow was I wrong! Surely one of the other two is actually more accurate right? So which one should be trusted?
Thanks for any input

ETA: OK, it got even weirder. I turned down the temp dial and the glass thermometer immediately began registering a drop, the dial a little more slowly, but the digi stayed at 108 for along time. It still said 104 when the others reached 100. So maybe the digi is crapola? Maybe the glass one actually IS more receptive/fast/accurate?? Maybe it really was 115 when it said it was? And the digi is reading 25% humidity while the dial is reading 35%?
ETA - again - Tossing the digi. I took it out and put it in front of the A/C and it took forever to register any change

Last edited: