- Apr 22, 2013
- 3
- 0
- 7
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its the fact that she has a beard and muffs that make her not an araucana, and they have green legs and are not a recognized color that make them not araucana or ameraucana. Tufts look totally different than what your birds have. Ameraucana are white skinned birds which means they will never have yellow or green legs. If your birds has yellow or green legs it is not an ameraucana but a hatchery mix breed bird. Hatcheries DO NOT carry araucana. The genetics behind them are lethal in two copies and therefor make them a difficult breed to propagate and 75% of the progeny of two purebred araucana do not meet the Standard of Perfection to be an araucana because they do not have tufts, therefor it is not worth the hassle or lack of money for hatcheries to breed and sell purebred araucana.So, here's my question... I know that Ameraucana and Araucana folks are VERY sensitive to having someone call their bird either when it is a "hatchery EE". It usually comes down to "the leg color screams EE". What if the rest of the bird looks like an Ameraucana or an Araucana but the leg color is "off". Is the leg color the primary determining factor in whether the bird is an Amerauana, Arauacana or EE? It all just seems so petty to me sometimes, in reading the different breed threads. I am not trying to start anything but sometimes it just seems to get ridiculous. Sometimes we just want to know "what color" or "what sex" is our bird, and it turns into "that's not an Ameraucana/Araucana, that's an EE".
This pullet was about 6 months old in this picture, was sold as an Ameraucana, is it the legs that make her an EE?
This one is 11 weeks old, was sold as an Araucana, has no tail, small tuffs. Is it the legs that make it an EE?