Global warning is not scientific fact. It is a theory that is widely held by some segments of the scientific community and disputed by others. This forum should not be about arguing politics--which is what this is becoming.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I concur, the UN is not a legitimate organization in my opinion. The US pays a higher share than any other member and we get ridiculed by the UN if we have a president who DARES put the American People first.Sorry, you lost me at United Nations. I don't want to give any credibility to any global body particularly one as corrupt as the UN even if their position supports something I do.
In my view these are decisions that should be made locally. We may not always agree with them but then it is time to spring into action and change things or move if it is that important to you. I live in a town that has a zoning law prohibiting livestock and I legally have six chickens in my backyard now. It took a lot of work and effort on my part but also paved the way by at least defining the process for the next person. Unfortunately the answer sometimes is ultimately going to be no and then you need to decide if you want to be an outlaw or not. The last thing I want is some international body defining how I am allowed to live.
Just my .02
Link doesn't work, but who's facts?Here's some more info on Bob Stallman and the American Farm Bureau Federation's stance on global climate change. Yet another person that wants to deny scientific facts.
http://ucsusa.org/assets/documents/global_warming/climate-scientists-letter-to.pdf