Search results for query: *

Quote: You are right we were not there. How do we know they did not get breaks, or this was not done in segments? How do we know that the animal was forced to stand the whole process? The shock collar theory is odd too cause the neck is usually where it goes and how would it get painted then...

Quote: ditto... it's actually not against the law or cruel. Chicks are dyed in the shells, by way of a small hole in the egg. they hatch already colorful. People conducting wildlife studies often do this to wild ducklings, laboratories do this to track certain groups for various studies...

I'll just say this once, and then i'm finished with trying to explain my position as I do not want a debate, i posted my opinion and the reason i hold it. Thats all it is...MY personal opinon. Would you dye a chick or bunny at easter? If you do or would do so I would first check your state laws...

I said it was just a personal opinion. That's all it is and I respect everyone elses opinon, so, on this, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

Quote: Out of curiosity, why do you think it's abuse? They're not hurt, neglected, unhappy or anything (as far as I know), and a dog isn't going to look in the mirror and think "Aw man, I look silly". Because they are dying the coats, what does the amonia in the dye do to their skin? If...

while cool looking, it boarders on animal abuse In my opinion. Sorry, had this debate with someone when it first came out a few months ago. I just dont see it as being kind or caring.