Quote:
It was sudgested to me that I should get a cockeral from a different line, so as to not breed brother to sister. Is this wrong?
no not really unless there is something wrong with the first line and you are trying to fix it. You can breed brother x sister for a generation or two without problem. These are not humans or horses they are going to be just fine with inbreeding. how do you think that some of these people keep closed flocks for tens of years? its really ok whichever way you decide. just get the best you can afford. I've read the best crosses are mother x son and father x daughter this apparently really locks in the genes desired (and not desired as well so be careful with this also). I think that I also read that human siblings only share about 45% of the same DNA. Just think if your eggs came from a flock of one rooster and five hens. They would only be half siblings and probably less related than one would think (granted that the parent stock was gathered from different sources).
I dont think there is much wrong with the originators flock. She did state in her add that she is working on removing black from the wings. I do not know how closely related her flock is though.
So if I was to keep this cockeral, breed him to the pullets that I have, then choose the best cockeral out of what hatches. I could then put the "new cockeral over the original hens I have now, and not be to closely related?
Sorry that these are such newby questions, but I am just that when it comes to breeding chickens. lol
Thanks for your insight!