Quote:
A RIR male and RIW female do produce a sex-linked offspring, don't they?
At least that is what the feathersite.com page that you and I both linked says.
Yes, they do, because the RIW, as I said above, is often genetically silver. This is the recipe for the Hubbard ISA Brown, from what I've read.
I am sure you are much more knowledgeable about this. I prefaced my first post with "As I understand it" and later admitted that I made an assumption based upon feathersite.com which says that RIR (male) x RIW (female) produce a sexlinked offspring. I hope I have not gotten you upset, it was not my intention, I am just trying to better understand.
One more question and then I will bow out so that the thread does not become overly contentious.
If the "white" in a RIW is not from the sex-linked silver gene, then a RIR (male) x RIW (female) would not reliably produce a sex-linked offspring, would it?
A RIR male and RIW female do produce a sex-linked offspring, don't they?
At least that is what the feathersite.com page that you and I both linked says.
Yes, they do, because the RIW, as I said above, is often genetically silver. This is the recipe for the Hubbard ISA Brown, from what I've read.
I am sure you are much more knowledgeable about this. I prefaced my first post with "As I understand it" and later admitted that I made an assumption based upon feathersite.com which says that RIR (male) x RIW (female) produce a sexlinked offspring. I hope I have not gotten you upset, it was not my intention, I am just trying to better understand.
One more question and then I will bow out so that the thread does not become overly contentious.
If the "white" in a RIW is not from the sex-linked silver gene, then a RIR (male) x RIW (female) would not reliably produce a sex-linked offspring, would it?