According to livestock conservancy Sebbies, Chinese, and Africans are keeless but they make no mention of Romans being keeless or otherwise.
https://livestockconservancy.org/heritage-breeds/heritage-breeds-list/sebastopol-goose/
https://livestockconservancy.org/heritage-breeds/heritage-breeds-list/chinese-goose/
https://livestockconservancy.org/heritage-breeds/heritage-breeds-list/african-goose/
https://livestockconservancy.org/heritage-breeds/heritage-breeds-list/roman-geese/
This got me thinking more about exactly what “keeless” defines. Flightless birds don’t usually have keels because they usually don’t have much of wings so a keel is no longer necessary.
I always assumed “keeless” in geese meant a reduced keel, not an absent one. I’ve never had a breed that’s definitively described as
keeless so I have nothing to go off of. My Roman has a keel, with her I’d say it isn’t as prominent as my Toulouse’s keels, but she could just be fat so it’s hard to say.
I tried searching for what a chinese, Sebastopol, African, or keeless goose skeleton looks like and didn’t have any luck, but I stumbled on a something that confuses it even more.
It appears that some define a single lobe as a “keel” which is incorrect. A lobe is fat/loose skin that hangs from the body of a goose, some have two lobes in front of their legs, others have a single lobe that hangs beneath the keel, and others have a lumpy mix of both. A keel is a modified breast bone that flight muscles attach to.
Now I would think that breeders, exhibitors, and judges wouldn’t confuse this, weirder things have occured, but I would think people wouldn’t confuse the two.
Point is though, I’m questioning what
keeless even means.