I think there might be a lot MORE people breeding them if they weren't so darn difficult to get a decent show specimen. (I say this based more on what I have read from long time breeders vs. personal experience.)
Also, "lethal gene" is in and of itself a huge turn off to folks. Most don't bother to figure out exactly what that means—to them it just sounds like Araucanas are weaklings as opposed to the potentially fascinating dual-purpose breed they might otherwise become. I love the look of the rumpless birds, with or without tufts. I would be more inclined to figure a way to keep them if I could show non-tufted varieties. As it stands, it seems to take more dedication and space than a more casual fancier might be willing to invest at the outset, and if you can't snag them to start, it's more difficult to really sink your claws in, so to speak.
And, keep in mind I say these things from the outside, as someone who is fascinated by and in love with Araucanas, but doesn't think they have the space or resources to "do it right".
Also, "lethal gene" is in and of itself a huge turn off to folks. Most don't bother to figure out exactly what that means—to them it just sounds like Araucanas are weaklings as opposed to the potentially fascinating dual-purpose breed they might otherwise become. I love the look of the rumpless birds, with or without tufts. I would be more inclined to figure a way to keep them if I could show non-tufted varieties. As it stands, it seems to take more dedication and space than a more casual fancier might be willing to invest at the outset, and if you can't snag them to start, it's more difficult to really sink your claws in, so to speak.
And, keep in mind I say these things from the outside, as someone who is fascinated by and in love with Araucanas, but doesn't think they have the space or resources to "do it right".