Quote:
I hear what you're saying PP and I understand it on some level, but after umpteen years of rescue work I for one would never give one of my rescues (cat, dog, bird or any other living thing) to someone who has this philosophy because I have no way of knowing if they're a kook or not. I could only give living feeling beings to folks who welcome - indeed, even eagerly embrace - scrutiny because they understand that the world is full of danger and would not want a defenseless being to end up in the wrong hands. And believe me, after years of finding homes for rescues I could tell you stories that would make your skin crawl. People who on the surface appeared to be sweetness and light but who in reality were
very dark souls. I truly wish I had the time to recount some of these stories right now because they make my point better than I possibly could by speaking in generalities. It is through these experiences that I have come to understand how crucial it is to screen thoroughly (and so that prospective adopters can feel secure in trusting me, I make sure they have a 'resume' and references for me should they want to do any checking up).
I live this philosophy in reverse as well. When I adopt a being from anywhere I want the person from whom I'm adopting to feel welcome to visit and ask me anything under the sun because it's not supposed to be about me or my convenience or my privacy, it's supposed to be about the well being of the fur or feather soul placed in my care. I even send them photos and updates over time if they are interested.
JJ
If we were talking about human children, i would agree with you, but i don't equate the two. I think that humans have an important responsibility to treat the animals in their care with decency and certainly not to abuse them. Folks who house 15 dogs in a crate made for one and make them live in last month's feces ought to have similar things done to them.
Don't get me wrong. But they're still not human children, and should not be treated as such (
in my slightly less than humble opinion).
When it comes to chickens specifically (which is where this started, i think
), as mama2many pointed out, i'm definitely not letting a person i don't know, who raises chickens, walk around anywhere near my chicken housing, etc. I can get chickens from somewhere else; thank you. But then again, i pretty much keep a closed flock at this point. For the most part, i raise my own. The longer i raise chickens, the more strict i become about the risk of outside germs. If i lost them all, it might break me in two. So i guess, for me, it's really a non-issue.
To be clear, i might have different ideas about how things should work, but i don't have anything against folks who work hard to keep animals out of horrifying places about which we have all heard and lamented.
My focus is just in a different place.