Assess thyself

If you want a  real general knowledge test, take an old form of the MAT!
https://miller-analogies-test.netlify.app/
While all of the items are analogies, the content of those analogies is heavily GK-based. I rushed (spent something like 15 minutes) through it a long time ago and did a massive amount of guessing and ended up getting like 67 out of the 100 questions correct, lol
It's brutal
 
Last edited:
Uhhh...yeah...I totally didn't take that one.

Going to now.
Oh boy.
😅😅😅😅
Screenshot_20220521-201013.png



















Screenshot_20220521-201008.png
 
If you want a  real general knowledge test, take an old form of the MAT!
https://miller-analogies-test.netlify.app/
While all of the items are analogies, the content of those analogies is heavily GK-based. I rushed (spent something like 15 minutes) through it a long time ago and did a massive amount of guessing and ended up getting like 67 out of the 100 questions correct, lol
It's brutal
I tried...I quit after guessing the first 6.
 
I tried...I quit after guessing the first 6.
At least the percentiles are relatively generous, I think 67/100 appeared to be around 90-95 relative to the graduate school bound population (since it's a graduate school admission test) so the gen. pop. percentile should be somewhat higher, and I was 17 when I did it. But it really does feel like I just got lucky with guesses there; I have no clue what a lot of the stuff referenced is. It's definitely far from my favorite test, as it seems like extra reading / concerted exploration of a bunch of academic topics would required to even be exposed to a lot of the information that the test demands.
 
At least the percentiles are relatively generous, I think 67/100 appeared to be around 90-95 relative to the graduate school bound population (since it's a graduate school admission test) so the gen. pop. percentile should be somewhat higher, and I was 17 when I did it. But it really does feel like I just got lucky with guesses there; I have no clue what a lot of the stuff referenced is. It's definitely far from my favorite test, as it seems like extra reading / concerted exploration of a bunch of academic topics would required to even be exposed to a lot of the information that the test demands.
Okay, now… I’m curious and just might dive into that one….
 
It's interesting because it has an extremely high ceiling, supposedly something like +4 to +5 standard deviations if I'm not mistaken.
/does a sideways glance double take

“+4 or +5”??? So, any clue what kinda of graph will that look like?
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom