Ayam Cemani Test Breeding

Update; the first 4 chicks of the first in a series of test trials hatched yesterday. Two others have piped & the other 4 should begin hatching in 2 days.
 
Unfortunately I have never had a higher incubation mortality rate. Out of the 10 fertile eggs only 6 chicks survived. 2 died after hatching and 2 eggs failed to hatch. The 2 chicks that didn’t make it looked identical to the 6 survivors, both of which favored the darker version. It is unclear if the darker chicks are attributed to the “Blues” and “Cream legbar”/ “Blue” BA cross, and the lighter version attributed to the one “Splash” hen in the trial. I believe this is a factor given the CL/BA cross both carry the plumage hues of the "Blue" Blue Ameraucana’s, by which my CL hen was bred to a Blue roo. Be that as it may. In conclusion;

Here are the photos of each chick. I think it is safe to say the roo in the first trial was an FM1, which was my theory before the trial. My theory for the next breeding trial is that the roo is an FM2. If I am correct a second time, then my stance with respect to this trial will be met with major reservations, quite possibly a complete waste of time. Why, because my theory for both is based solely on visual aspects of the breed. We shall see…
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2774.JPG
    IMG_2774.JPG
    1.6 MB · Views: 31
  • IMG_2773.JPG
    IMG_2773.JPG
    1.7 MB · Views: 24
  • IMG_2772.JPG
    IMG_2772.JPG
    548.7 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_2776.JPG
    IMG_2776.JPG
    1,014 KB · Views: 15
  • IMG_2775.JPG
    IMG_2775.JPG
    1.4 MB · Views: 14
  • IMG_2777.JPG
    IMG_2777.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 42
I have decided to abandon this test trial for the following reasons;

1- Anyone who has spent countless hours familiarizing he or herself with this breed can visually arrive at a consensus as to which birds are either a FM1, FM2, or neither. Case in point; my first trial. My theory was that he was an FM1 and the trial proved that.
2- The amount of time it would take to test in excess of 2 males and 10 females is simply ridiculous.
3- The photos below is of a male that was born in February of this year and will take over as my breeder roo for the 2021 season. I don't believe a test trial is necessary to convince me he is an FM2. Using the Ayam Cemani's own "Code of Perfection" guidelines; this roo does not exhibit even the slightest sign of leakage.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2987.JPG
    IMG_2987.JPG
    1.2 MB · Views: 39
  • IMG_2986.JPG
    IMG_2986.JPG
    1.2 MB · Views: 41
  • IMG_2981.JPG
    IMG_2981.JPG
    1 MB · Views: 49
Last edited:
Here are the latest photos of the same Ayam Cemani Roo above & a few of the girls I selected out of 150+ from last years hatch. I am certainly looking forward to this years offspring.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3320.JPG
    IMG_3320.JPG
    869 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG_3323.JPG
    IMG_3323.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 26
  • IMG_3326.JPG
    IMG_3326.JPG
    2.3 MB · Views: 24
  • IMG_3325.JPG
    IMG_3325.JPG
    2.4 MB · Views: 21
  • IMG_3340.JPG
    IMG_3340.JPG
    783.4 KB · Views: 21
  • IMG_3339.JPG
    IMG_3339.JPG
    821.5 KB · Views: 20
  • IMG_3331.JPG
    IMG_3331.JPG
    592.5 KB · Views: 23
Both the Chinese Silkie and Ayam Cemani have been bred for thousands of years for their black skin/meat/face, recent genetic studies have confirm that they share the same mutation and give it a date of around 9000 years ago(well before the chicken domestication event)


Reference: The origin and evolution of fibromelanosis in domesticated chickens: Genomic comparison of Indonesian Cemani and Chinese Silkie breeds.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173147


Fibromelanotic is an autosomal incomplete dominant mutation of the fm allele(Fm is the mutation and fm+ is the recessive wildtype counterpart), but here is the catch, for Fibromelanotic to be expressed at all it needs the help of the recessive sex linked dermal enhancer id+, This means that if you don't know this and you are performing a test cross of your Cemani stock with the wrong type of chicken your results will be inaccurate and may lead to the culling of a perfectly fine line.

Here is an example:

Ayam Cemani hen genetic make up:

E/E: Extended Black, black chick down
Fm/FM: Fibromelanotic
id+/- : Recessive Sex linked Dermal enhancer
W+/W+: Black Skin

Rhode Island Red rooster genetic make up:

eWh/eWh: Wheaten
fm+/fm+: non-fibromelanotic wildtype
Id/Id : Sex linked Dominant Dermal Inhibito(will inhibit any and all dermal melanin expression)
w/w: Recessive yellow skin


The result of such cross will yield F1s with White Skin, red combs and white undersole with dark shanks(Extended black allows for epidermal melanin to express)

E/eWh: Black Chick down
Fm/fm+: Heterozygous Fibromelanotic
Id/- for females and Id/id+ males
W+/w: White skin

So going by this cross you would be baffled to see that 100% of the chicks that hatched have white clear skin?

Now do the reciprocal cross(Cemani Roo over RIR hen) and you will get Sex links(pullets will hatch with black skin and cockerels will hatch with white clear skin)


Ayam Cemani Rooster genetic make up:

E/E: Extended Black, black chick down
Fm/FM: Fibromelanotic
id+/id+ : Recessive Sex linked Dermal enhancer
W+/W+: White Skin

Rhode Island Red hen genetic make up:

eWh/eWh: Wheaten
fm+/fm+: non-fibromelanotic wildtype
Id/- : Sex linked Dominant Dermal Inhibito(will inhibit any and all dermal melanin expression)
w/w: Recessive yellow skin

E/eWh: Black Chick down
Fm/fm+: Heterozygous Fibromelanotic
id+/- for females and Id/id+ males
W+/w: White Skin for males and Black Skin for females.

So even if you had pure Ayam Cemani(homozygous for the Fibromelanotic mutation) if you test it with the wrong type of hens or roosters your result will be inaccurate and I just believe that is unacceptable for someone not to mention that when writing about that on that page.

So what are acceptable breeds? Breeds with slate or willow shanks, don't use extended black birds(solid black birds) as they may have slate colored shanks but that is due to epidermal melanin and they may very well be sex linked Id.
@nicalandia , I can thoroughly appreciate this explanation. But my question, to complete the explanation, can you put this in terms of what they refer to as FM1 and FM2?
And what the outcome of such a test would produce, an FM1 Cemani vs an FM 2 cemani?
I think everyone is very curious as to what to look for in terms of identifying FM2 birds, to use for further breeding, and how to avoid or isolation their FM1 birds from the flock. Thank you in advance.
 
Oh my while I may not understand all the scientific language I absolutely love reading and learning from those who do. My question is how did the test turn out.

Also, I'm starting AC flock. Can you give me a clear answer on exactly what characteristics they should have to be bred and which ones they shouldn't have. Ie I have 2 with 1 white toe nail. Is that trait a cull trait?

I also have 4 out of 5 that have a grayish look to them only 1 turned out solid black.

I want to make sure I build a good flock
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom