I know there isn't an established blue laced red wyandotte standard. I'm curious if what I'm thinking of doing would be bad.
I hatched some eggs under 3 broody hens. I didn't realize it, but a hen that was given to me by a friend as an ameraucana was an Easter egger with 1 blue and one white egg gene. I hatched it thinking it was going to be an olive eggers.
Roo:
Hen:
I wasn't intending to hatch mutts. My wife liked the colored eggs, so I though I had a few layers that didn't lay tan eggs. Marans, Easter egger and olive eggers.
I had this girl after the hatch grew out.
I hatched some more eggs this spring under more broodies. I hadn't gotten any olive eggs, and assumed she was slow to start laying.
I had this baby hatch out. So the splash lays tan eggs. The blue and splash hens were my only two bearded muffed hens. I had also discovered the roo carried a straight comb gene. This girl is more than likely the splash offering, as she has a chance to have the straight comb gene. The small pullet is only partially laced with a straight comb, but has a muff and beard and yellow skin.
So my question is, would it be irresponsible to attempt to breed beards and muffs into my laced red wyandotte? She would be an F2, so 75% wyandotte. Any babies would be about 87%.
I also don't have to use f2 specifically, I can also use the F1 hen and shoot for a rose comb. I've also passed along the F0 sire with the recessive straight and kept two of his F1b black laced sons. One of the two F1 blue laced red hens carries the straight, the other does not. There is about a 42% percent chance of a homozygous rose with these two F1b guys and 58% they are hetrozygus rose.