Bob Blosl's Heritage Large Fowl Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
If I used the term Stanard Breed Large Fowl in this tread do you think I would have had the success of luring you over from the commercial chicken normal TREADS??????????????????????

I dont think so. I started some other threads and they died in four of six pages.

I dont like this term but this is the term Frank Reese asked me to push. Why I dont know. Maybe he has a trick up his sleeve down the road to help the APA in inspecting flocks of people as a judge to confirm you stain of old large fowl is suite able to be called Heritage. My old mentors such as Maurice Wallace of Canada who helped me with Rhode Island Reds and Franklin J Young of Minnesota called and used the term Standard Breed Birds. In a way Standards are large fowl Bantams are bantams bantam ducks are bantam ducks ect.

I consider the term Standard breed large fowl as large fowl that are breed to the APA standard of Perfection and would at least score about 92 points out of a hundred. Now no judge today is going to say I judge by the old fashion Scoring system. I judge by comparison judging they will say. But if you read some of the old poultry books and breed books they did have point cuts for color and type combs ect and these old boys scored each bird and wrote the score on the coop tag. The bird with the highest score won the class and was in the run for say Champion American or Champion English or Mediterranean class. Then the bird that looked the best or scored the highest if there was a tie the judges would look them over and then they would decide who was worthy for best and second best large fowl of the show. So just go back 60 years or so about the time all of these breeds that I consider to be Heritage or part of the group that was in the APA standard of Perfection for say the 1962 issue was judged by ten old timers who where judging your strain say at a poultry show your birds would average 92 points or higher. Lets say you had a two cock birds two hens two old trios two cockerels two pullets and two young trios. That's a good average number of birds. Do they score at least 92 points? If you had chicken like I had to begin with barred rocks from my uncle which look like the thousands of barred rocks sold each year they would score about 85 points and most of them would be disqualified.

So when I get personnel message from a father wanting to get his two girls some Barred Rock Large Fowl like yesterday. What or who do I send them to. They have all ready the Tractor Supply type of Barred Rocks. They are smart enough to see that they do not look like the pictures in the catalogs that the hatcheries show for this breed. So I send them to a person who has a flock that has at least 94 points per average and the males have good finished tails at 9 months of age. You can get a start from any buddy but its cheaper to get a start from a person who has a great gene pool and then you have a little wiggle room if you screw up in your first five years. If they are line breed correctly and they are a uniform bunch of birds they will breed true for color and type for about five years be for they start to return to the orgin they where once be for improved by breeding by selection to the Standard of Perfection.

Barred Rocks are on the top of the list of Heritage or Standard Breed Large Fowl. They where started in the 1860s and latter improved.

I have a plan in my head that I am going to put into this computer on How to Get Started with Heritage Large Fowl but Don't know How.

I will use the example of two breeds Mottled Javas and Light Sussex large fowl. That's pretty much rare and off the wall from the normal birds such as Rocks and Reds.

So if we start with two males and two females then we hatch the young chicks then I walk you through step by step to adult hood and then we bring your best four males and six females to a show in December such as the New Winter Show in Pensacola Floria that we stared early this month. Then we will look at all the bird you brought plus my same number of birds and we will select the breeders for the following year. Any surplus birds that we will not use will be shared with two others who want to start these to new strains. This is like breeding 101 or Breeding for Dummies type of article. All you have to do is exchange Mottle Javas for your favorite breed. It will all be the same if I had 50 different breeds brought to this show and you asked us and a few supper star large fowl judges how to go about this. So in the next few days I will get this out of my head on paper and then share it with you.

One thing we will not do and that is cross different strains from other people to get started. That is a beginners night mare. We also will not cross black Javas onto mottled Javas.

We will stick with What We Have. One of my mentors once told me on the phone Start With What you Have. Then move forward and improve.

Well kick the can down the road. If you need some breeds let me know. Just don't get to car red away with the color you want. The pretty er they are the harder they are to breed.

Walt would you like to come out to Pensacola Florida and judge one Dec or March some day? We only pick the top Large Fowl judges for this show. You are part of the group and New York Reds would be great to get as well.

Out side to give my chickens some warm water and high protein feed it was cold down here last night but no snow. bob


I like the point system . . . in Dutch horses, if an animal cannot reach the number of points required for the top level ( first premium) those ribbons are not awarded.

THis is where is get nervous as a newbie going to a show to find the best. The winner may not be the 92 point bird.
 
Don't worry about it at all. The Point System is not used in America any longer at Poultry Shows regardless of what the Standard states.

Birds are judged by comparison today and not by points.
 
I think the ALBC appreciates the work of the SPPA. You are not at odds, but fellow workers together.

Here locally we have loads of churches. Baptist, Pentecostal, Methodist, Catholic, Presbyterian etc. Twice a year we have a community worship service. We do not all agree on doctrine, but have the same goals. One Thanksgiving service was in a Baptist church, with a Pentecostal preacher leading the service and a Catholic priest bringing the message. We work together. The offering is given to the Ministerial Alliance to help travelers passing through with food, shelter fuel etc.

If we all (APA, ABA, SPPA and ALBC etc) work together we will succeed in preserving all of these old, antiquated, rare, heritage breeds of fowl.

Quote:
Some of us are arguementative by nature while the rest of you have to work at it.
 
saladin,
Who did the right up for the SPPA that had the break down of the breeds as in Industrial, Traditional Agricultural, and Historical?
That was a good article, The title was "Why the S.P.P.A. is needed".

Chris
 
I think you are right. The ALBC continues to hold membership in the SPPA.
Both are focused on preservation they just have different ways of reaching those goals. They both have their place.
 
When it's all said and done, I think the "heritage" definition has convinced more people to raise standard-bred poultry, than it did to convince people to buy meat and eggs from these birds.
Which is a good thing!
 
saladin,
Who did the right up for the SPPA that had the break down of the breeds as in Industrial, Traditional Agricultural, and Historical?
That was a good article, The title was "Why the S.P.P.A. is needed".

Chris
I think Christine did that one.
 
When it's all said and done, I think the "heritage" definition has convinced more people to raise standard-bred poultry, than it did to convince people to buy meat and eggs from these birds.
Which is a good thing!
This is quite possibly the truth. Americans have a love affair with things that are currently in vogue. Trouble is, when the current vogue changes which it surely will then Americans will change too. They are chaff driven by the wind.
 
Hi, I've been lurking on this thread from the beginning, and I'd like to put my two cents in on the term "heritage fowl". It would be best to think of it as being similar to the term "classic car". When someone says "classic car" anybody knows what is being referred to. The good old ones that have stood the test of time. You can probably find some car show people ready to gouge each other's eyes out over whether a particular vehicle is or isn't "classic", but just about everybody else knows what classic means without a dictionary or google or a lawyer. The ALBC definition of "heritage" is for the purpose of marketing meat from noncommercial birds. If that is what you want to do, then the ALBC definition is the one you need to go by. If not, if you want exhibition birds, old-time farm birds, homestead birds, or whatever, the ALBC definition of hertage is irrelevent. If there is a standard-bred chicken breed that you love, and you want to preserve it and breed it to be exactly what it was meant to be, then what does it matter if it makes some particular list of "heritage fowl"? I think more can be gained by talking old-timey golden oldie chickens, where to get them, and how to breed them right, than by getting into legalistical bickering over one word that really doesn't matter in the end.
A sensible voice!

Welcome to the conversation.
 
This is quite possibly the truth. Americans have a love affair with things that are currently in vogue. Trouble is, when the current vogue changes which it surely will then Americans will change too. They are chaff driven by the wind.


Ah but there is people whom stay true to heart. No Vogue here.

VIVI
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom