There is a lot of wisdom to be drawn from the wish to refrain from the superficiality and, frequently, redundancy of color. Instead we can turn to substance. When we really begin to know what good chickens are, color only moves us when it is adorning a bird of substance.
I agree 100%. In the equine color fads come and they always fall by the way side. The quality was never there to keep it around. People were breeding ANYTHING together and because it was a color that was pretty. I have always bred what people called a plain sorrel or bay. But the difference between my plain colored horses are they can actually perform, and are built to last (conformation). I love the Wyandotte, they need a lot of help. In this breed I see so many issues related to shape. I look at shape first and color last. The foundation has to be there first. But lots of people see color first and that is what they concentrate on. I would like people to look at these pretty colored birds in a black/white picture and then tell me they are Wyandottes. Take away the "color" and look at the shape...Okay I am getting off my soap box.
I agree 100%. In the equine color fads come and they always fall by the way side. The quality was never there to keep it around. People were breeding ANYTHING together and because it was a color that was pretty. I have always bred what people called a plain sorrel or bay. But the difference between my plain colored horses are they can actually perform, and are built to last (conformation). I love the Wyandotte, they need a lot of help. In this breed I see so many issues related to shape. I look at shape first and color last. The foundation has to be there first. But lots of people see color first and that is what they concentrate on. I would like people to look at these pretty colored birds in a black/white picture and then tell me they are Wyandottes. Take away the "color" and look at the shape...Okay I am getting off my soap box.
Last edited: