- Thread starter
- #4,451
That's the thing, though....there shouldn't be any arguments at all. One is a show breeder and all the efforts are geared towards producing dogs fit for show and the other is a small time breeder that breeds a few dogs that are good enough for folks to keep as hunting, herding or pet quality dogs. Never the twain shall meet as they both have a different focus. Comparing the two is futile, so arguing about methods is also futile.
This thread is about breeding for production or meat and isn't even about breeding to SOP or for show. I'd say if one's flock is improving in the areas of more meat and eggs that's good enough to call it an improvement. Some folks just don't see it as this super serious endeavor that requires any argument at all...it's just chickens. Food animals. Shouldn't even garner that much back and forth at all as it's just chickens. It's fun to discuss improving them, but when it gets down to arguing, the fun is sucked right on out of it.
Having been a dog breeder/professional handler for many years, I can say with confidence, there are plenty of 'pet' dogs that result in the efforts to breed top show or excellent hunting or herding dogs. To breed specifically for the 'pet trade' should be a Capital Crime, considering the condition and state of animal welfare in the US and indeed the world.