This may be more about interpretation than the actual phrase itself. The way I take it to mean is: "Don't sacrifice type and body for color or fancy feathers." If two birds are equal in type and body and size, then you select for the coloring, but don't keep a pretty-feathered bird with poor body over the one with excellent body but not as good of color. With the gold-laced, I will have quite a bit going on, colorwise, and I found a nice little chart on the Wyandotte lacing that shows what missing genes looks like, as the proper lacing takes three sets of genes.
Hubby asked a really good question the other week when we were sitting out one evening watching the chickens. He asked about where the gold color will come from if I am using Luanne's black phase BLR. I explained that she is still culling for "brassiness," which is the gold gene showing through. Last night we were looking at the pullets from January, who are beginning to pink up in the face, and I pointed out all three pullets have the brassiness, plus a bit of gold on their wing primaries. It is a bit of luck there, but I will happily take it.
Another interesting little aside, I emailed a fellow named Chuck Hagi, who had a GLW project using Sandhill and Cackle stock. He responded, saying he abandoned the project because while he got great lacing and good profile, he could not get size in the two years he worked on them. I know I have seen his name before in regards to breeding chickens, but still have not been able to place where I saw him mentioned before. Luanne's birds definitely have size, as that is one thing she told me she will not compromise on since it is so hard to get it back if lost.
No. Let me be more frank, and as a result more clear. "Build the barn before you paint it" is a mis used, over used, catch all phrase used, by those that do not know an better. It is better used and applied by those that raise dominant white or black birds. Then there is no confusion, and it could actually apply. So the problem is as much in it's use as it is in it's interpretation.
Your explanation is a good attempt at a middle ground, but explains again, why the phrase is not helpful . . . hinting at the complexities that can be involved in breeding some colors. We can neglect it if we want to, but it is be careful of what we ask for. For those that do not prefer to be concerned with color should work with birds that have none. That solves it all. LOL.
It is foolish to spend years to build type, and then take years re building it to get the color right.
Birds are neither houses nor barns. We are also not painters, and there is no paint thinner to clean up mistakes. The two go together as we move along, and the priorities and emphasis does shift as the birds change.
It is a harmful phrase, and not a helpful phrase.
And I mean this in all seriousness to newcomers. Color doe not lay eggs, or put flesh on a frame. Anyone not interested in the distractions, and are concerned with utility alone . . . forget the fancy varieties which are meant to be fancy . . .instead get a simple color variety.
The more characteristics to select for, the longer it takes to make progress. It also requires years to master the art of breeding some colors. Many can repeat much to do with one, but putting it into practice is another matter all together.
Now, to that same newcomer, I am not saying to avoid a color that strikes your fancy. By all means, learn to master the art of breeding that color. There is a lot of joy and pleasure in learning to breed a color. I am learning to breed one of the most difficult colors. The color I speak of is not a difficult color pattern to achieve, but it is extraordinarily difficult to perfect. But I love this color, and I enjoy this challenge.
The more challenging colors are a life time's work, and the learning them never ends.
The "fancy" varieties', by nature, will never ever set production records. They can certainly be productive however. And when they are, and their type is good . . . . the color is right, the vigor and health is high, they hatch like popcorn, and the flock is uniform . . . they become a remarkable achievement. Something to be proud of and admire.
A life time's work and something worth passing down, like passing a torch.