Quote:
Originally Posted by Beekissed
I agree, the expectations are greater but I think it's of detriment to the birds in a lot of ways. That constant striving to produce a bigger, quicker maturing meat bird doesn't allow for any considerations to their long term health nor their ability to reproduce normally and maintain fertility.
I think most of the breeders back in that day knew when to quit and that's a valuable gift when it comes to developing the genetics of living creatures. It was important then to actually be able to reproduce reliable and consistent standards in a particular breed and that the breed be hardy and balanced in all ways~good feathering, good health, good fertility, good size and shape, and the ability to pass along those same traits.
All I see people focused on nowadays is "how much do they weigh by such and such an age?"
So true. I'm all about a thrifty bird. There are birds that need improvement - like the ones we have. But that is because the breed we have barely survived the 20th century. And I don't think it was the production that was the problem so much as the *show* qualities - these suckers change a good bit as they age and I think it was the difficulty in getting them to conform to certain SOP appearance qualities that turned the fanciers off of the birds and caused their significant decline in numbers. I don't know how much more we can improve them, but once we reach that goal, then we'll maintain them. But even now, they work well in our farm environment for both meat and eggs.
I think a lot of folks who are trying all these breed criss-crosses in the hopes of getting their ideal bird, still are maintaining a very modern, commercial poultry type mindset - one that is not sustainable for the long haul. It often seems to be more about the power to create something new, than it is to be content with what is available while looking for areas to improve upon and doing so.
Originally Posted by Beekissed

I agree, the expectations are greater but I think it's of detriment to the birds in a lot of ways. That constant striving to produce a bigger, quicker maturing meat bird doesn't allow for any considerations to their long term health nor their ability to reproduce normally and maintain fertility.
I think most of the breeders back in that day knew when to quit and that's a valuable gift when it comes to developing the genetics of living creatures. It was important then to actually be able to reproduce reliable and consistent standards in a particular breed and that the breed be hardy and balanced in all ways~good feathering, good health, good fertility, good size and shape, and the ability to pass along those same traits.
All I see people focused on nowadays is "how much do they weigh by such and such an age?"
So true. I'm all about a thrifty bird. There are birds that need improvement - like the ones we have. But that is because the breed we have barely survived the 20th century. And I don't think it was the production that was the problem so much as the *show* qualities - these suckers change a good bit as they age and I think it was the difficulty in getting them to conform to certain SOP appearance qualities that turned the fanciers off of the birds and caused their significant decline in numbers. I don't know how much more we can improve them, but once we reach that goal, then we'll maintain them. But even now, they work well in our farm environment for both meat and eggs.
I think a lot of folks who are trying all these breed criss-crosses in the hopes of getting their ideal bird, still are maintaining a very modern, commercial poultry type mindset - one that is not sustainable for the long haul. It often seems to be more about the power to create something new, than it is to be content with what is available while looking for areas to improve upon and doing so.
Last edited: