Quote:
HOLY COW 50?
Thanks sourland and 6lil.
Yes, there are many named highly-inbred strains of mouse used in laboratories. The goal is to have mice that are virtually identical. Realize, however, that early on in the creation of these lines, there had to be a lot of culling out of sickly mice. Once the "bad" recessive genes reared their ugly heads in homozygous form, those traits could be removed from the breeding pool, and in the end, a strain of near clones could be made that lacked harmful recessive genes. Mice also have a much shorter generation time than peafowl (weeks as opposed to years between birth and sexual maturity), and the "proper selection" mentioned above means you'll potentially have lots of sickly offspring to cull before you'd be sure you have a healthy inbred line.
~Christopher
Also keep in mind that as you shrink the gene pool, you will also potentially have birds that have less resistance to a certain disease. It could be one rare thing that wipes them all out because they don't have even small differences in immune resistance. Scientists have seen this as a problem in wild species that are not in a controlled environment. The cheetah has this problem where the gene pool is not diverse enough and this can pose a problem to them in the future. It is much easier to raise, cull, and select a gene pool in a very controlled scientific environment.
Now that being said, it is very beneficial to do bottle necking of the gene pool and select for identical mice or other test animals in a lab . It is one of the best ways to get solid scientific data where you take some of the variants out of the equation by using "identical" mice.
AquaEyes
Like your thoughts on peafowl and the scientific swing you put on things. Good for new ideas here on the forum and I liked reading the post on peafowl showing two phenotypes for color.