Chris, thanks so much for the effort you put into educating folks on here. It is most helpful to not only the Buckeye folks but everyone breeding. My Buckeyes are on the way and I'm expecting a call tomorrow morning from the PO. Can't wait to pop those little potlickers in the incubator.
I wanted to add one little thing that may be common-sense and already thought of but on the outside chance that it's not may be found helpful. To my mind, bringing in "new blood" solely for the purposes of "genetic diversity" doesn't make a lot of sense. It seems to me that one would be more concerned with the breeding program and the goals of the breeder than where the birds came from. For example, I have one line of Welsummers that is the German line and from one of the original five breeders that got them and the Barnevelders accepted into the APA/ABA in 1991. I am also getting a line that is from the Netherlands/UK line and from one of the other more well-known original breeders.
Now, if I take those two lines and always keep them separate BUT through poor breeding practices, I totally mess the breed up, one certainly can't go back and point to the original breeders for my lack of good breeding practices. So, in other words, I think many folks are missing the boat when looking at "genetic diversity" - especially when looking to a hatchery to provide it.
There is an awful lot of talk on BYC about "genetic diversity" and "inbreeding" amongst certain breeds. This brings up an interesting point that begs the question, Is inbreeding harmful? I think one has to first define inbreeding vs. line breeding. Line breeding is what I practice. My understanding of inbreeding is Brother-to-Sister matings. Line Breeding is Father-to Daughter or Mother-to-Son (or GD or GS or GGD or GGS, etc.) From what I have read, inbreeding can be very useful to enhance certain traits. However, it may also bring a fault or DQ to light that would otherwise possibly not pop up.
I am not even remotely close to being anywhere near understanding genetics. Having said that, it is my understanding that too much inbreeding cannot create a problem but rather brings a problem that already exists to the surface. In other words, practicing inbreeding is not going to create some sort of mutation that results in a monster or other oddity. The problem as I understand it comes when inbreeding brings a problem to the surface and then further inbreeding multiplies that problem in the stock and exacerbates the problem.
Am I correct in my understanding? If I am, then logic would tell me that inbreeding can be just as effective in producing faster results toward a good bird as it could a bad bird. One must just be more diligent about culling.
God Bless,