I've always found chooks love to be bathed. Strange creatures.
But then again they are naturally jungle fowl, I'd guess getting soaked is natural to them. Mine don't mind the rain either.
Quote: Some folks think of chooks like they're totally wild birds, not domesticated for thousands of years. So they never handle them. It makes it easy to see when they're sick because then they let you handle them. This theory works, until you realize that your chooks are often past the point of being helped once they've reached the point of not fleeing from what terrifies them. Kinda pointless waiting for them to start dying to handle them to treat them.
Some people say that they're livestock, not pets, so need no handling; but them being non-tame livestock will prevent every necessary treatment being administered without stress, from injury and illness treatment to bringing them to a calm and peaceful death when necessary. Many unnecessary deaths are caused by people simply not taming the animals under their care. It makes stress and hardship and risky interactions for both man and animal.
It does not make sense in the long run, from any point of view, to not tame your livestock. The biggest cattle farmers in Australia take care to tame their cattle despite never seeing them for up to a year at a stretch in some cases. They have strict rules for how they are to be treated. If you cannot handle your livestock to do whatever is necessary without distressing the life out of them, then a fundamental and necessary part of animal husbandry has not yet been taken care of. It's not how often they're handled, it's how they're handled when they are.
Our ancestors didn't work to keep animals tame for the fun of it. It's necessary for our safety and the animal's. I remember an old bit of history I read about shepherds in one country. If a sheep had an anti-tame, human-averse mentality and tried to lead the flock to panic at the shepherd's approach, the shepherds would break one of its legs. Then they'd splint it, put it in a pen, hand-feed it, and make a pet of the sheep while it recovered. When recovered, it would have a pet's mentality and would reliably lead the flock to the shepherd, not away. It sounds quite cruel, but it was either this, or kill the sheep and thus lose a possibly necessary productive member of the flock, or let it continue to scare the flock so they would risk losing their livelihood and possibly watch their families starve. Harsh measures for harsh times. Not that I'd use this method, personally.
I've had chooks become tame and friendly after I've tended them through an injury or illness (nothing deliberately inflicted, don't worry) whereas before the life-changing event they were hostile to humans without cause. Our actions and environment turns genes on and off according to what we do, eat, and experience, and the same is true of animals. Sometimes a life-changing event is all they need to become good productive flock members. It's happened so often that now my family jokes about it, having seen my previous rescues and patients change after treatment.... Now, when we see a chicken being unfriendly without cause, we joke that it needs a 'life threatening event'.