Quote:
Try again. They are both A_B_C_D_E_. The difference between castor and chestnut occurs elsewhere, among the rufous intensifiers, which is also where the difference between a red and an orange happens. (These are not to be confused with the rufous gene, which is what puts red on the belly of the Tan.) Self(a) is very common in both breeds, as is chocolate(b), dilute(d) and non-extension(e). Without seeing the pedigrees of the parents, you cannot rule out the presence of such common recessives, in fact I would think it highly likely that they would both carry at least one that is the same. While Mendelian ratios indicate that the majority of the offspring should be agouti, the product of a single pair (or particularly, a single breeding) can be wildly skewed. And since steel is dominant to chestnut, it is quite possible that chestnut offspring, either broken or solid or Dutch-marked, could actually wind up a minority (particularly if any recessives turn up!).
Akane, I wasn't concerned about you flooding the market with the offspring of a single pair. I just wanted you to be aware of the fact that the market may already be flooded, it's good to know that you already have a contingency plan. There have been several local stories in the last few years of people discovering a number of rabbits that have been dumped in an unpopulated area. Sometimes it appeared that they are a single litter, other times it was clear there were too many for that. It doesn't take much creativity to figure out that someone found out they couldn't sell them, and was unwilling to kill them, so they tossed 'em out before they wound up being eaten out of house and home! If you are prepared to deal with any that you can't sell, I say, have fun - you may be pleasantly surprised at what turns up!
Try again. They are both A_B_C_D_E_. The difference between castor and chestnut occurs elsewhere, among the rufous intensifiers, which is also where the difference between a red and an orange happens. (These are not to be confused with the rufous gene, which is what puts red on the belly of the Tan.) Self(a) is very common in both breeds, as is chocolate(b), dilute(d) and non-extension(e). Without seeing the pedigrees of the parents, you cannot rule out the presence of such common recessives, in fact I would think it highly likely that they would both carry at least one that is the same. While Mendelian ratios indicate that the majority of the offspring should be agouti, the product of a single pair (or particularly, a single breeding) can be wildly skewed. And since steel is dominant to chestnut, it is quite possible that chestnut offspring, either broken or solid or Dutch-marked, could actually wind up a minority (particularly if any recessives turn up!).
Akane, I wasn't concerned about you flooding the market with the offspring of a single pair. I just wanted you to be aware of the fact that the market may already be flooded, it's good to know that you already have a contingency plan. There have been several local stories in the last few years of people discovering a number of rabbits that have been dumped in an unpopulated area. Sometimes it appeared that they are a single litter, other times it was clear there were too many for that. It doesn't take much creativity to figure out that someone found out they couldn't sell them, and was unwilling to kill them, so they tossed 'em out before they wound up being eaten out of house and home! If you are prepared to deal with any that you can't sell, I say, have fun - you may be pleasantly surprised at what turns up!
