- Thread starter
- #41
- Dec 7, 2011
- 2,317
- 245
- 231
Sorry about the skip in time between parts of the article, it took me awhile trying to understand. I Think he is saying that silver pied is a mutation of the white eyed gene, because he says that without the WE, there would be no SP. But that may not have been what he meant because he went on to say "As with breeding any pied pattern of peafowl the ratio is 1-2-1. When breeding Silver Pied to Silver Pied you get an average of 25% white, 50 % Silver Pied, 25% Dark Pied “White-Eyed”. So doesn't that suggest that he see's SP as just a convenient way of saying a white bird with we and 10-20% color? Also, in his 1-2-1 ratio, is he calling a dark pied any bird with over 20% color? Does that mean that "officially" there is only silver pied and pied, and that loud and dark are just a convenient way of implying the amount of white? I think he is saying that the "frosting" comes with age and therefore wouldn't be considered a prerequisite for a young bird to be silver pied.So what is your take on Brad's article. Is he saying any pied WE bird is silver pied if it has lots of white or do you think he is saying or implying that there is a mutation of the WE gene that makes silver pied different from pied white eye?
I don't think you are being difficult at all. I just think the definition already exists, we just may not have the knowledge to understand it.
Edited to include: Would the UPA recognize pied white eye separately from silver pied if there is not a mutation involved?
Last edited: