Thanks for correcting me on that. That’s about as clear as mud isn’t it? It took many readings but I think I can follow what they are talking about though there are some things that seem contradictory.
Body weight as a function of chick weight was not significant. However, chick weight was significant when included in a model with egg weight, suggesting that significant differences in BW at 50 d could be attributed to both egg and chick weights.
What the heck does that mean? Chick weight was not significant, yet it is.
If you follow one of the links to the right, it gives dwarf dam egg weight and chick weight were just a little lower than the eggs from standard hens, 67.3 grams egg weight for standard and 63.0 for dwarf about 94% smaller.
I think what it is saying is that the weight gain per gram egg weight (but maybe chick weight factors in somehow) is the same per gram no matter which group you took the chicks from. At 50 days, which is probably butcher day, the dwarfs should be 94% the size of the ones from the standard which in the face of it doesn’t sound good, but maybe you save enough in feed to make up that size difference and profit margins are better. For a hatchery that hatches 1,000,000 chicks a year, a 1% difference in hatch rate is 520,000 chick a year.
The more I learn the less I know.
Again, thanks for that.